Development Site At 532253 143328, Plough Road, Smallfield, Surrey, Data via plota.co.uk

2022/1658/Cond2 Pending
Admin / procedural

Proposal

Details pursuant to Condition 9 (programme of archaeological work), 10 (Construction Environmental Management Plan(CEMP) ) and 13 (proposed road junction with Meadow View and the proposed pedestrian-cycle only access from Meadow View at the south western corner of the site) of planning permission ref: dated 17/07/2024 (Development of up to 120 residential dwellings with associated infrastructure, open space and vehicular and pedestrian access, with additional engineering works to provide for flood relief. (Outline application with all matters reserved saved for access) (Amended description)) Data via plota.co.uk

Track application Save this application and get an email when its status or decision changes. Alerts nearby Get email alerts for new planning applications near this address.
View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
2 Sept 2026
Decision
Expected by 30 Oct 2026

Under consideration

No decision has been issued yet. A decision is expected by 30 Oct 2026.

The consultation period closed on 4 Oct 2026.

Documents

View the documents on the council's website ↗

Associated applications 2

  • Part of

    Outlinecouncil archive

    Conditions details submitted for 9, 10, 13

    • ConditionsDetails pursuant to Condition 9 (programme of archaeological work), 10 (Construction…This application2022/1658/Cond2

Site constraints 4

Green belt: London
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.
Read the government guidance ↗
Flood zone 2, rivers and sea
Medium chance: between a 1 in 100 and 1 in 1,000 annual chance from rivers, or 1 in 200 to 1 in 1,000 from the sea. Any development here needs a flood risk assessment. Defences are not counted.
The Environment Agency flood map for planning. Homes in zone 3 must also pass the sequential test. Surface water flooding is a separate map.
Flood map ↗
Article 4 direction
Land East Of A22 And South Of / Redhill Tonbridge Railway.. Named permitted development rights are withdrawn here.
An Article 4 direction withdraws particular permitted development rights, so work that would normally need no application needs one here. Not every council has published its directions.
Agricultural land, grade 3b
Not best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s), which most planning maps still show, had this area as grade 4. The predicted grade is Defra's current estimate; only a site survey settles it.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Not affected
No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Tandridge - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Nearby new applications

15 Oct 2026Pending

Rede Cottage, 57 Redehall Road, Smallfield, Horley, Surrey, RH6 9QA

Variation of Condition 3 (Plans) of planning permission ref: 2024/1389 dated 30/...

2026/1286
29 Sept 2026Pending

Plough Road Playing Field, Plough Road, Smallfield, Surrey, RH6 9JN

Formation of a flood attenuation storage area, including a flood wall and kerb, ...

2026/1139
25 Sept 2026Pending

1 The Woodlands, Smallfield, Horley, Surrey, RH6 9NP

1) Oak - Reduce overhanging rear of garden by 3m back to adjacent driveway and r...

2026/1023/TPO
18 Sept 2026Approved

Mole End, Cogmans Lane, Smallfield, Horley, Surrey, RH6 9JD

Erection of rear extension which would extend beyond the rear wall of the origin...

2026/1169/NH
3 Sept 2026Pending

18 New Road, Smallfield, Horley, Surrey, RH6 9QN

Erection of single storey extension, side dormer and garage

2026/838

Important details

Council
Tandridge
Received
2 Sept 2026
Validated
2 Sept 2026
Parish
Burstow
Target decision
30 Oct 2026

Consultation & key dates

Comments by
4 Oct 2026
Tandridge
Planning Authority Score
2.3/10
Poor
#264 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Tandridge is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #234 out of 296. The council extends the time limit on 56% of applications - one of the highest rates in England. Expect your application to take longer than the standard deadline. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (90%) than the national average (90%).

Frequently extends decision deadlines
expect longer than the statutory limit
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Tandridge decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
84%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #228 of 296
90%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #196 of 296
51%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #234 of 296
56%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #255 of 296
68%
Minor dwellings approved
122 decided (1-9 homes)
47%
Major dwellings approved
17 decided (10+ homes)
75%
Change of use approved
8 decided
701
Total decisions
113 refused in the year to March 2026
Source: MHCLG planning statistics · See full council rankings