Deed of variation at Land East Of Highwood Quarry Woodside Way Dunmow, Great Dunmow

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Uttlesford Planning Committee on 2 Sept 2026.

UTT/26/0053/DOVApproved

What was proposed

The applicant proposed varying the 1939 Agreement so the approved Easton Park development could be implemented within its boundary.

“The report relates to a proposed Deed of Variation to a historic planning agreement dated 28 April 1939 affecting land at Easton Lodge, Great Dunmow. The agreement imposes extensive restrictions on the use and development of the land, including limitations on residential development and other forms of operational development.”

“The proposed variation is limited in scope and would apply only to land within the approved development boundary. It would not grant planning permission, alter the approved scheme, or confer any additional development rights. All remaining provisions of the 1939 Agreement would continue to apply to land outside the development site.”

Officer report

The site and approved scheme

The site forms part of the Easton Park area and already has outline permission for up to 1,200 homes and associated development.

“The site comprises part of the Easton Park development area at Easton Lodge, located to the north-west of Great Dunmow and south of Little Easton. The land extends across a substantial area of former parkland and agricultural land that is subject to a historic planning agreement dated 28 April 1939.”

“The proposed Deed of Variation relates to a planning agreement dated 28 April 1939 affecting land at Easton Lodge, Great Dunmow. The Deed of Variation seeks to modify the historic agreement by disapplying certain restrictive provisions within the Easton Park development site, as defined by a new plan, to enable the lawful implementation of outline planning permission UTT/21/1708/OP.”

Officer report

What officers recommended

Officers recommended approval because the deed was necessary, limited to the approved area and would not add development rights.

“The matter before Members is not an application for planning permission but a proposed Deed of Variation to the 1939 Agreement. The principal consideration is whether it is appropriate and necessary to vary the Agreement to resolve the conflict between its restrictive provisions and the extant outline planning permission for Easton Park (UTT/21/1708/OP), thereby enabling the lawful implementation of the approved development.”

“The proposed Deed of Variation would introduce a new plan corresponding with the approved Easton Park application boundary and would disapply the restrictive provisions of the 1939 Agreement within that area only. This would ensure that the residential, mixed-use, infrastructure and open space development authorised under planning permission UTT/21/1708/OP can be implemented without conflict with the historic Agreement.”

Officer report

Consultation and representations

No statutory, parish or other consultations were undertaken, and no representations were received.

“No statutory consultations were undertaken in relation to the proposed Deed of Variation.”

“No consultation was undertaken with the Parish Council, as the proposal relates solely to a Deed of Variation to a historic legal agreement and does not constitute a planning application or seek approval for development.”

Officer report

Members’ discussion

Members questioned the deed’s necessity, site access, legal opinions, compensation concerns and whether their concerns had been addressed.

“In response to questions from Members, Officers said: - • There should not be a need to move into a private sitting as adequate information had been provided in the Addendum List. • The Deed of Variation applied only to land within the Easton Park planning permission boundary and the remainder of the 1939 Agreement would continue to apply outside the Easton Park site.”

“Members discussed: - • Why the deed was necessary. • Access to the site. The access road had been included in the Planning Inspector’s previous approval. • The legal opinions offered. • The clarity that had been provided in respect of the strip of land, any possible compensation and the requirement for the Council to make the decision. • Whether all concerns had been addressed.”

Minutes

The vote and decision

Councillor Driscoll proposed approval, Councillor Pavitt seconded it, and the committee resolved to approve the deed.

“Councillor Driscoll proposed approval of the Deed of Variation to the 1939 Agreement relating to land at Easton Lodge, Great Dunmow, as set out in the report. This was seconded by Councillor Pavitt.”

“RESOLVED that the Deed of Variation be approved.”

Minutes

Sources

  • Uttlesford Planning Committee minutes, 2 September 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Uttlesford's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Uttlesford
Date
Wednesday 2 September 2026
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)

This committee's year

66 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 7 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →