Leats Farm Withen Lane Aylesbeare Exeter EX5 2JQ Data via plota.co.uk

25/2499/V106 - Section 106 Viability Reappraisal Approved

Proposal

The planning permission ( and ) were not lawfully commenced and the bungalow built was materially different, as established by the certificate of lawfulness . The applicant is seeking the formal removal of the S106, which sought to impose an agricultural tie on Leats Farm, the original farmhouse. The permissions are obsolete and the S106 not in effect. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
around 5 Dec 2025
✓
Approved
20 Jul 2026

Approved on 20 Jul 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 7 Oct 2026

Associated applications 2

  • Part of

    LawfulnessApprovedcouncil archive
    • LawfulnessThe were not lawfully commenced and the bungalow built was materially different, as…This application25/2499/V106

Site constraints 1

Agricultural land, grade 3b
Not best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No listed building at the site

Checked on 7 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in East Devon - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
East Devon
Application type
Section 106 Viability Reappraisal
Postcode
EX5 2JQ
Received
around 5 Dec 2025
Validated
5 Dec 2025
Ward
West Hill And Aylesbeare
Parish
Aylesbeare
Decision
Legal agreement agreed and issued
Decision date
20 Jul 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show
Agent
HC Planning Ltd

How this decision compares

Decided in 227 days from validation, 171 days slower than East Devon's median of 56 for section 106 and planning obligations. Approved, as 91% of section 106 and planning obligations here are.

53%decided within 8 weeks
91%approved
1,098decided in the last year

Plota live figures for section 106 and planning obligations decided across the UK in the last twelve months, from validation; too few recent section 106 and planning obligations in East Devon to go on. East Devon decision record →

Public comments

No public comments yet.

Last counted 7 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Env. assessment
No
East Devon
Planning Authority Score
6.7/10
Good
#72 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

East Devon ranks #103 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (94%) than the national average (90%).

These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
East Devon decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
88%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #152 of 296
94%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #104 of 296
72%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #103 of 296
34%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #86 of 296
63%
Minor dwellings approved
168 decided (1-9 homes)
74%
Major dwellings approved
23 decided (10+ homes)
88%
Change of use approved
25 decided
1,321
Total decisions
157 refused in the year to March 2026