Tree works at Northdown Park Depot Northdown Park, Margate

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Thanet Planning Committee on 15 Jul 2026.

TCA/TH/26/0574Approved

What was proposed

The application seeks three tree removals and maintenance works to trees including horse chestnuts, limes, sycamores, yews, elders, holm oak and elm.

“LOCATION: 1 No. Holm Oak (T1203) - Fell; 1 No. English Elm (T1199) - Fell, 1 No. Ash (T1179) - Fell Works to the following trees: 5 No. Horse Chestnut (T1175, T1176, T1177, T1182, T1183), 4 No. Common Lime (T1193, T1198, T1200, T1207), 7 No. Sycamore (T1181, T1187, T1189, T1195,T1197, T1201, T1204), 3 No. Yew (T1191, T1196, T1208), 2 No. Elder (T1188, T1194),1 No. Holm Oak (T1190), 1 No. English Elm (T1202)”

Officer report

The site

The trees are in public open space within the Cliftonville Conservation Area and collectively have high amenity value.

“The trees are situated within the Cliftonville Conservation Area, situated in the public open space overlooked by Northdown Park Road, Queen Elizabeth Avenue, East Northdown, and Northdown Road. The trees are a mix of species and various ages and sizes. They form an attractive feature, adding positively to the character of the conservation area. The trees collectively have high amenity value, though some individual trees within the group would be much lower in amenity value.”

Officer report

Why officers supported it

Officers considered the works reasonable management practices that would support tree health, public safety and access without significantly harming the area’s amenity.

“These works appear to be reasonable management practices aimed at ensuring the health and safety of both the trees and the surrounding environment, while maintaining access and safety for pedestrians and vehicles.”

“The proposed felling of 3 trees is justified, T1199 - Elm is dead, T1203 Holm Oak, has poor form and a decaying wound, and T1179 Ash has 50% crown die back. The other proposed works, primarily crown raising and pruning, are necessary for maintaining public safety and assisting with future assessments.”

Officer report

Public response

A site notice was posted, and no letters of objection or concern were received.

“A site notice was posted near the site, and no letters of objection or concern have been received regarding the proposed works.”

Officer report

The committee vote

The motion to agree the officer recommendation was carried with nine votes for, no votes against and no abstentions.

“Councillor Rattigan proposed and Councillor Makinson seconded that the officer recommendation to Raise no Objection be AGREED.”

“When put to the vote the motion was AGREED.”

Minutes

Councillors at the meeting

Apologies Mike Garner Green, George Rusiecki Conservative

Also attending Ruth Duckworth Labour

Source: Plota analysis of the council's minutes; parties from the council's list of councillors.

Sources

  • Thanet Planning Committee minutes, 15 July 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Thanet's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Thanet
Date
Wednesday 15 July 2026
Committee decided
Approved
Councillors
11Labour 7Conservative 2Green 1Reform UK 1Show councillors
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)

This committee's year

86 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 2 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →