Land At Palmer House And Nelson Mansions Off Castle Street Ryde Isle Of Wight Data via plota.co.uk

26/01105/RVC - Condition (Removal or Variation) Registered

Proposal

Variation of condition 2 on to allow alterations to west side of proposed dwelling Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
13 Aug 2026
✓
Validated
27 Aug 2026
Decision
Expected by 22 Oct 2026

This application is under consideration - no decision has been issued yet. A decision is expected by 22 Oct 2026. Comments are open until 9 Oct 2026.

Comment on this application ↗

Associated applications 2

  • Part of

    VariationApprovedcouncil archive

    Conditions 2 variation sought

    • VariationVariation of condition 2 to allow alterations to west side of proposed dwellingThis application26/01105/RVC

Site constraints 7

Grade II listed: Palmer House
List entry 1234442 · 2 m away · 26 more listed buildings within 150 m (25 Grade II)
Listed building consent is needed for work that affects the special interest of a listed building, inside or out, on top of planning permission. Setting can be a consideration for buildings nearby; there is no fixed radius.
Show the other 26 with distances
Historic England ↗
Nutrient neutrality catchment: Solent: Includes Chichester and Langstone Harbours SPA/Ramsar, Solent and Southampton Water SPA/Ramsar, Solent Maritime SAC, Portsmouth Harbour SPA/Ramsar
New homes and overnight accommodation must show nutrient neutrality before approval.
Natural England advice: extra wastewater in these catchments harms protected habitats, so schemes must offset their nutrient load, usually through credits.
Heritage at risk: Ryde
On the register of historic places assessed as at risk.
A designated building, monument, park or conservation area assessed as at risk from neglect, decay or development. Proposals that secure its future are looked on favourably.
Historic England ↗
Special protection area 228 m away: Solent & Southampton Water
Work nearby can need a habitats assessment.
Harm to a protected site is only accepted where there is no alternative and an overriding public interest.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 2
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
SSSI 228 m away: Ryde Sands and Wootton Creek SSSI; Inside the Ryde built-up area.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 3 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Isle of Wight - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Condition (Removal or Variation)
Received
13 Aug 2026
Validated
27 Aug 2026
Ward
Ryde North West
Parish
Ryde
Case officer
Show
Applicant
Show
Agent
Richard Mazillius:Architecture

Public comments

1comment received
1 supporting

Last counted 3 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-15136290
Comments by
9 Oct 2026
Env. assessment
No
Isle of Wight
Planning Authority Score
8.9/10
Excellent
#7 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Isle of Wight is one of the fastest councils in England for householder decisions, ranking #11 out of 296. Only 15% of applications have the time limit extended, well below the 41% national average - the council usually decides on time. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (95%) than the national average (90%).

Among the fastest councils in England
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Isle of Wight decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
92%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #84 of 296
95%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #81 of 296
92%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #11 of 296
15%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #11 of 296
84%
Minor dwellings approved
144 decided (1-9 homes)
67%
Major dwellings approved
18 decided (10+ homes)
94%
Change of use approved
34 decided
792
Total decisions
63 refused in the year to March 2026