Roof and rear extensions at Pantelis, 42 - 44 Harbour Street, Ramsgate
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Thanet Planning Committee on 16 Sept 2026.
What was proposed
The application proposed a third-floor extension, a four-storey rear extension and changes to windows.
“The proposed development is the erection of a third floor extension and a four storey rear extension together with alterations to fenestration. The proposed third floor extension would replace the existing dual pitched third floor with a metal standing seam mansard roof. The four storey extension would be located within a courtyard and provide a new staircase for the flats.”
Officer report
The site
The site is a prominent four-storey corner building that was damaged by fire in 2021 and previously contained a shop and three flats.
“The site comprises a prominent four storey building located on the corner of Harbour Street and Albion Hill. The property was damaged by a fire in 2021. Prior to the fire the property was in use as a retail unit at ground floor level and three one bedroom flats above. The flats were accessed through a door on the Albion Hill elevation. A small courtyard is accessed through the existing door on the Albion Hill elevation and is enclosed by the neighbouring buildings.”
Officer report
Earlier planning history
Earlier permissions covered shopfront changes, alterations, canopies, balconies, pavement seating and conversions to flats or holiday accommodation.
“F/TH/03/0179 - Alterations to shopfront to front and side elevations. Granted 02 May 2003”
“F/TH/95/0252 - Provision of canopies and balconies to front and side elevations. Granted 09 June 1995”
Officer report
What officers advised
Officers recommended approval because the design would cause limited harm and the public benefit of reusing the property would outweigh that harm.
“Concern has been raised regarding the proposed rear extension being located on a neighbouring right of way and a fire escape for a neighbouring property. The rear extension would be located within a courtyard that can only be accessed through the application property or the neighbouring properties. A route would remain through the application property from the courtyard to Albion Hill.”
“This application would facilitate the reuse of an existing property that is sited in a prominent location within Ramsgate. The roof extension would change the appearance of the property and the rear extension would alter the size of the rear courtyard, however the harm resulting from this proposal is considered to be limited and when weighed against the public benefits of bringing the property back into use, this harm is considered to be outweighed.”
Officer report
What people said
Two objections raised concerns about access, a fire escape, overbearing impact, loss of light and scale, while the heritage forum and conservation officer sought design clarification.
“Two letters of objection have been received raising the following concerns: * Impact upon neighbouring right of way * Impact upon neighbouring fire escape * Overbearing impact * Loss of light * Scale of development…”
“Ramsgate Heritage and Design Forum - Concern was raised over the Mansard roof and its impact on the neighbouring property. If this could be clarified then that would be helpful. With regards to the rearrangement of the Harbour facing windows, we would encourage reuse of existing sash windows and feel that the window ‘heads’ could match those on the french doors on the lefthand side.”
Officer report
What members considered
The application was brought before members to consider its impact on the Conservation Area.
“This application has been brought before members by Cllr Crittenden to consider the impact of this development upon the Conservation Area.”
Officer report
The committee vote
The motion to approve the officer recommendation and conditions was agreed by 12 votes, with no votes against and no abstentions.
“Councillor Rusiecki proposed and Councillor Boyd seconded that the officer recommendation to APPROVE be agreed, subject to the following conditions:”
“When put to the vote the motion was AGREED.”
Minutes
The decision
The application was approved subject to conditions covering the start date, approved drawings and approval of external materials.
“3 Prior to the construction of the external surfaces of the development hereby approved samples the materials to be used in the construction of the building(s) shall be submitted to, and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. Development shall be carried out in accordance with the approved samples unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority.”
Minutes
Councillors at the meeting
- Helen CrittendenChairLabour
- Pat MakinsonLabour
- Martin BoydLabour
- Mike GarnerGreen
- Jennifer MatterfaceLabour
- Jack PackmanLabour
- Marc RattiganReform UK
- George RusieckiConservative
- Rebecca WingGreen
- Linda WrightConservative
- Joanne BrightSubstitute for AlbonLabour
- Leo BritcherSubstitute for K. BrightLabour
Also attending Marlène Dasburg Labour, Ruth Duckworth Labour
Source: Plota analysis of the council's minutes; parties from the council's list of councillors.
Sources
- Thanet Planning Committee minutes, 16 September 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Thanet's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Committee
- Thanet Planning Committee
- Council
- Thanet
- Date
- Wednesday 16 September 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Councillors
- 12Labour 7Conservative 2Green 2Reform UK 1Show councillors
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- View application →
- All decisions
- Thanet committee decisions →
This committee's year
95 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 2 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.