Detached rear garden garage at 21 Murrayfield Avenue, Edinburgh
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Edinburgh Development Management Sub-Committee on 16 Sept 2026.
What was proposed
The application proposed a detached garage in the rear garden, with a terraced area and associated landscaping works.
“The application site forms part of a terrace of two-storey and attic, two-bay houses on Murrayfield Avenue. The application relates to the rear garden area which backs onto a service lane off Henderland Road. An existing garage to the rear of the garden was previously demolished and hardstanding now exists in its place which forms a raised terrace area. There are currently electric metal gates to access the garden from the rear service lane.”
“The application proposes the erection of a detached garage within the rear garden and an associated terraced area.”
Officer report
The site
The site is a rear garden behind a listed terrace, beside a service lane, within the Coltbridge and Wester Coates Conservation Area.
“The site is located within the Coltbridge and Wester Coates Conservation Area.”
Officer report
Earlier applications
Earlier permissions covered rear landscaping, gates, fencing, parking and terracing, while an application for ancillary accommodation was withdrawn.
“18/00718/LBC 21 Murrayfield Avenue Edinburgh EH12 6AU Minor landscaping works to rear comprising new gates and fencing to rear lane; car parking and terracing; paths and general soft landscaping. Granted 17 April 2018”
“18/00720/FUL 21 Murrayfield Avenue Edinburgh EH12 6AU Minor landscaping works to rear comprising new gates and fencing to rear lane; car parking and terracing; paths and general soft landscaping. Granted 10 April 2018”
Officer report
Consultation and publicity
No consultations were undertaken, while neighbour notification and publicity generated 33 contributors.
“Date of Neighbour Notification: 21 May 2026 Date of Renotification of Neighbour Notification: Not Applicable Press Publication Date(s): 29 May 2026 Site Notices Date(s): 26 May 2026 Number of Contributors: 33”
Officer report
Objections raised
Thirty-three objections covered the garage’s design, materials, heritage effects, garden space, neighbouring amenity, boundary walls and lane safety.
“- The proposed design and scale of the garage would be out-of-keeping with the other garages in the lane. - The proposed materials are out-of-keeping with the area. - The proposals would harm the character and setting of the listed building. - The proposals would harm the character and appearance of the conservation area. - The proposals would result in inadequate garden ground left over. - The proposals would have an adverse impact on the amenity of neighbouring residents.”
“- The proposals would allow for access to the lane to leave bins for collection - There would be no changes to the existing level of access to the lane from the host property. - The lane is not owned by the applicants and there are concerns over maintenance of the boundary walls - This would be a Civil matter. - The lights at the existing garage harm the character of Henderland Road - There are no lights proposed as part of this application.”
Officer report
The committee’s decision
The committee granted the application subject to the conditions, reasons and informatives set out for the development.
“26/02074/FUL - Report by the Chief Planning Officer To GRANT the application subject to the conditions, reasons and informatives as set out in section C of the report by the Chief Planning Officer. 4.8 – 21 Murrayfield Avenue, Edinburgh, EH12 6AU Erection of detached garage within rear garden, with associated landscaping works (as amended) – Application no.”
Minutes
Permission requirements
Permission required the development to begin within three years and confirmed that the garage must remain incidental to the main property.
“The development to which this permission relates must be begun not later than the expiration of three years beginning with the date on which this permission is granted. If development has not begun at the expiration of this period, the planning permission lapses.”
“The permission herewith does not constitute the formation of a new planning unit and must be incidental to the main property.”
Officer report
Councillors at the meeting
- Hal OslerChairLib DemFor(no vote against recorded)
- Max MitchellVice-ChairConservativeFor(no vote against recorded)
- Chas BoothGreenFor(no vote against recorded)
- Christopher CowdyConservativeFor(no vote against recorded)
- Joan GriffithsLabourFor(no vote against recorded)
- David KeySNPFor(no vote against recorded)
- Martha Mattos CoelhoSNPFor(no vote against recorded)
- Amy McNeese-MechanSNPFor(no vote against recorded)
- Tim PogsonLabourFor(no vote against recorded)
- Alex StaniforthGreenFor(no vote against recorded)
The minutes record this decision with no vote against, so each member present for this item is shown as voting for it.
Source: Plota analysis of the council's minutes; parties from the council's list of councillors.
Sources
- Edinburgh Development Management Sub-Committee minutes, 16 September 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Edinburgh's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Council
- Edinburgh
- Date
- Wednesday 16 September 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Councillors
- 10SNP 3Conservative 2Green 2Labour 2Lib Dem 1Show votes
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- View application →
- All decisions
- Edinburgh committee decisions →
This committee's year
259 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 4 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.