Billingbear Park Golf Club The Straight Mile Wokingham RG40 5SJ Data via plota.co.uk

Proposal

Phased development of the site, comprising construction of padel tennis and pickleball courts (Phase 1); construction of a putting course (Phase 2); and demolition of existing marquee to the rear of the clubhouse and replacement with new extension and construction of a simulator building (Phase 3); together with car parking alterations and hard and soft landscaping. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
19 Jan 2026
✓
Validated
5 Feb 2026
✓
Committee
29 Apr 2026
✓
Approved
7 May 2026

Approved on 7 May 2026 · Committee · Last checked 7 Jul 2026

Planning committee

Decided by Windsor and Maidenhead Maidenhead Development Management Committee on 29 Apr 2026.

Approved unanimously

As officers recommended.

  • Officers advised approval because the scheme supported sport and business diversification, with limited harm managed by conditions.
  • One resident objected over road conditions, traffic, noise and closing time; the parish council raised concerns about the simulator and woodland.
  • Members unanimously approved the application with amended materials and tree-protection conditions.
Read how the committee decided The proposal, site history, officers’ assessment, public comments, committee debate, vote and decision.

Source: Plota analysis of Windsor and Maidenhead's committee minutes of 29 Apr 2026.

Documents 52

Statements & assessments 24

PDF Lhb ecology. biodiversity net gain assessment Supporting Information - Ecology · 24 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF The statutory metric macro enabled_billingbear park gc updated. Supporting Information - Ecology · 24 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF Ecology comment Consultee - Comments · 24 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF Sustainability. Consultee - Comments · 18 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF Ecology Consultee - Comments · 9 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF Ecology Consultee - Comments · 9 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF Ecology comment Consultee - Comments · 3 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF B.s. 5837 arboricultural method statement Supporting Information - Arboricultural report · 19 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF Bat emergence survey Supporting Information - Ecology · 19 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF Phase 1- contamination risk assessment Supporting Information - General · 19 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF Biodiversity net gain assessment Supporting Information - Ecology · 19 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF Energy and sustainability statement Supporting Information - General · 19 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF Flood risk assessment and drainage strategy Supporting Information - Flood Risk · 19 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF Landscape principles statement and plant images Supporting Information - Landscape · 19 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF Preliminary ecological appraisal Supporting Information - Ecology · 19 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF Statement of community involvement Supporting Information - General · 19 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF Transport statement Supporting Information - Transport · 19 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF Newt impact plan Supporting Information - Ecology · 19 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF Rev d Arboricultural impact assessment Supporting Information - Trees · 19 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF Arboricultural implications assessment Supporting Information - Arboricultural report · 19 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF Design & access statement Design and Access Statement · 19 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF Bng metric Supporting Information - General · 19 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF Planning statement Planning Statement · 19 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF Arboricultural implications assessment Supporting Information - Arboricultural report · 19 Jan 2026 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Associated applications 3

Site constraints 5

Green belt: London
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm.
Flood zone 2, rivers and sea
Medium chance: between a 1 in 100 and 1 in 1,000 annual chance from rivers, or 1 in 200 to 1 in 1,000 from the sea. Any development here needs a flood risk assessment. Defences are not counted.
The Environment Agency flood map for planning. Homes in zone 3 must also pass the sequential test. Surface water flooding is a separate map.
Flood map ↗
Agricultural land, grade 3b
Not best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s), which most planning maps still show, had this area as grade 4. The predicted grade is Defra's current estimate; only a site survey settles it.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 2
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
Priority habitat 23 m away: Deciduous woodland.
Not affected
No listed building at the site · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 11 September 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Windsor and Maidenhead - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Full
Postcode
RG40 5SJ
Received
19 Jan 2026
Validated
5 Feb 2026
Ward
Hurley And Walthams
Parish
Waltham St Lawrence Parish
Case officer
Show
Target decision
7 May 2026
Decision
Application Permitted
Decision date
7 May 2026
Decision level
Committee
Applicant
Show

How this decision compares

Decided in 91 days from validation, 36 days slower than Windsor and Maidenhead's median of 55 for commercial and major works. Approved, as 81% of commercial and major works here are.

56%decided within 8 weeks
81%approved
36decided in the last year

Plota live figures for commercial and major works decided by Windsor and Maidenhead in the last twelve months, from validation. Windsor and Maidenhead decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14619364
Committee
29 Apr 2026
Env. assessment
No
Windsor and Maidenhead
Planning Authority Score
5.3/10
Average
#135 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Windsor and Maidenhead is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #82 out of 296. Only 28% of applications have the time limit extended, well below the 41% national average - the council usually decides on time. Windsor and Maidenhead is also one of the strictest councils - it refuses more householder applications than almost any other, with only 74% approved vs 90% nationally.

One of the strictest councils
only 74% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Windsor and Maidenhead decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
72%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #293 of 296
74%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #294 of 296
75%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #82 of 296
28%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #47 of 296
44%
Minor dwellings approved
156 decided (1-9 homes)
96%
Major dwellings approved
27 decided (10+ homes)
64%
Change of use approved
25 decided
1,530
Total decisions
434 refused in the year to March 2026