Six commercial units at Former G B Antiques Centre Lancaster Leisure Park, Lancaster
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Lancaster Planning Regulatory Committee on 22 Jun 2026.
What was proposed
The application proposed six flexible commercial, storage and distribution units, partial demolition, new parking, fenced compounds and associated works.
“Location Plan 3.0 PROPOSAL 3.1 The application seeks the subdivision of the existing commercial building into 6 units for a mix of commercial, storage and distribution uses, demolition of part of the existing building, creation of a parking area, compound fencing and associated works. The flexible uses applied for include Class E (Commercial, business and service) e.g. retail, indoor sport facilities, offices, healthcare, nursery’s etc.”
“- Replacement of this north-eastern annex and some surrounding soft landscaping with 32 new car parking spaces and new fenced ‘compound’ areas for two of the proposed units in the former warehouse building (Unit 1 and Unit 3). As part of these works, it can be confirmed that landscaping containing the mature willow tree will be retained as shown in the submitted Arboricultural Impact Assessment.”
Officer report
The site and surroundings
The former antiques warehouse is a brownfield site within Lancaster Leisure Park, near commercial premises, an auction mart, an abattoir and housing.
“The application site comprises a large, single-storey former antiques warehouse extending to approximately 3,834 sqm Gross Internal Area (GIA), formerly operated by GB Antiques until its closure in February 2025. The building occupies a prominent position within Lancaster Leisure Park, a well-established out-of-centre leisure and commercial destination on the eastern side of Lancaster.”
“To the east of the site are a number of smaller commercial units comprising the Original Factory Shop, hair/salon, butchers shop, and a café, all of which fall within Use Class E. Immediately east of the application site is the leisure park’s customer car park. Beyond which is a small residential estate comprising Pottery Gardens. North of the site is an operating auction mart and abattoir.”
Officer report
Earlier site history
The relevant earlier permission allowed the factory to become an antiques warehouse with associated exhibition, repair, valuation and public sales activities.
“The wider site has an extensive planning history, but the most relevant to the site itself is listed below:”
“Application No. Proposal Status 01/90/1375 Change of use of factory to antiques warehouse including the exhibition, renovation, repair and valuation/demonstration with weekend sales to general public and vintage classic car exhibition, renovation, valuation and demonstration. Permitted…”
Officer report
What officers recommended
Officers recommended approval subject to satisfactory HGV information, highway re-consultation and conditions, with possible limits or removal of B8 use.
“Subject to additional information being required to demonstrate safe HGV movements to support the B8 uses forming part of the application, access, traffic and parking impacts for other modes of transport are consdiered acceptable, particularly having regard to traffic generation related to the former use. There is good access to public transport with measures incorporated into the scheme to promote sustainable travel.”
“Subject to receipt of satisfactory further information and re-consultation with the highway authority relating to safe HGV movements within the site, that Full Planning Permission BE GRANTED with the following conditions and any other conditions deemed necessary following consideration of further information.”
Officer report
The main planning issues
Officers considered the proposal acceptable on principle and found flood risk, drainage, biodiversity, amenity, design and sustainability impacts could be addressed.
“In terms of the principle of the proposed change of use, officers consider the ‘main town centre use’ sequential test and impact assessment to be both sound in method, geographical area and the number of sites considered. The sequential test concludes that there are no sequentially preferable sites within the defined catchment area for the scale and form of mixed-use development proposed.”
“In terms of the remaining criteria relating to transport, residential amenity and design, these are considered below.”
Officer report
What residents said
Four letters supported revitalising the leisure park, encouraged walking and cycling, and asked that traffic and parking impacts be considered.
“At the time of compiling this report, the following representations have been received: 4 letters of observation…”
“A summary of the main comments are: • The development should seek to encourage people to use sustainable forms of transport, including cycling and pedestrian opportunities. • In general support of the scheme, as it will revitalise the Leisure Park • The potential increase in traffic and parking should be considered.”
Officer report
The committee vote
Councillors proposed approval, and 15 voted in favour with none against and no abstentions.
“It was proposed by Councillor Keith Budden and seconded by Councillor Sue Tyldesley:”
“Upon being put to the vote, 15 Councillors voted in favour of the proposal with none against and no abstentions, whereupon the Chair declared the proposal to have been carried.”
Minutes
What the committee decided
The committee approved the application subject to further publicity, highway consultation, safe HGV information, conditions and possible delegated changes to B8 use.
“That the application be approved subject to the following conditions:”
Minutes
Sources
- Lancaster Planning Regulatory Committee minutes, 22 June 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Lancaster's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Council
- Lancaster
- Date
- Monday 22 June 2026
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Vote
- 15 for, 0 against
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- View application →
- All decisions
- Lancaster committee decisions →
Source: Plota analysis of the minutes.
This committee's year
59 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 3 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.