Bennerley Viaduct Visitor Centre Woodiwiss Road Awsworth Nottinghamshire NG16 2YE Data via plota.co.uk

26/00649/FUL - Full Application Registered

Proposal

Two 10ft shipping/storage containers to be placed adjacent to the existing Bennerley Viaduct Visitor Centre bin store. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
17 Sept 2026
✓
Validated
18 Sept 2026
✓
Consultation
29 Sept 2026
Decision
Expected by 13 Nov 2026

Under consideration

No decision has been issued yet. Plota predicts a decision around 6 Nov 2026, from Broxtowe's recent commercial premises.

Comments are open until 20 Oct 2026

Comment on this application ↗

Site constraints 7

Listed building: at the site
List entry 1247946 · 2 m away · 1 more listed building within 150 m (1 Grade II*)
Listed building consent is needed for work that affects the special interest of a listed building, inside or out, on top of planning permission. Setting can be a consideration for buildings nearby; there is no fixed radius.
Show the other one with distances
Historic England ↗
Green belt: Derby and Nottingham
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.
Read the government guidance ↗
Coal mining development high risk area
Recorded coal mining features at or near the surface. Most planning applications here need a coal mining risk assessment. Nearest recorded mine shaft: 36 m away (reference 447343-004). 2 recorded mine entries within 50 m.
From the Mining Remediation Authority, formerly the Coal Authority. The development high risk area marks recorded coal mining features at or near the surface: mine shafts and adits, shallow workings, mine gas and former opencast sites. Most planning applications there need a coal mining risk assessment; householder applications, changes of use and some minor works are exempt. Mine entry positions come from old plans and can be out by several metres, and unrecorded workings can exist anywhere in the coalfield.
Coal mining risk assessments ↗
Agricultural land, grade 3b
Not best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s), which most planning maps still show, had this area as grade 4. The predicted grade is Defra's current estimate; only a site survey settles it.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Local nature reserve 174 m away: Nottingham Canal
Work nearby can need a habitats assessment.
Harm to a protected site is only accepted where there is no alternative and an overriding public interest.
Habitat network: Network Expansion Zone
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
Heritage at risk 2 m away: Bennerley Viaduct, Awsworth Road (part located in Erewash Borough).
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Mining Remediation Authority and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Broxtowe - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Broxtowe
Application type
Full Application
Postcode
NG16 2YE
Received
17 Sept 2026
Validated
18 Sept 2026
Ward
Awsworth, Cossall & Trowell
Parish
Awsworth Parish Council
Case officer
Show
Target decision
13 Nov 2026
Decision level
Director of Planning and Development
Applicant
Show
Agent
Davey Stone Associates

Decision outlook

Day 21 of the 56-day target. Broxtowe usually decides commercial premises by day 49.

Day 2135 days to the 56-day target
77%decided within 8 weeks
94%approved
50decided in the last year

Plota live figures for commercial premises decided by Broxtowe in the last twelve months, from validation. Broxtowe decision record →

Public comments

1comment received
1 supporting

Last counted 7 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-15226849
Planning Portal ref
PP-15226849
Consultation
29 Sept 2026
Comments by
20 Oct 2026
Statutory expiry
13 Nov 2026
Env. assessment
No
Broxtowe
Planning Authority Score
8.4/10
Excellent
#16 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Broxtowe is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #48 out of 296. Only 29% of applications have the time limit extended, well below the 41% national average - the council usually decides on time. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (96%) than the national average (90%).

Faster than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Broxtowe decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
94%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #35 of 296
96%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #52 of 296
78%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #48 of 296
29%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #48 of 296
83%
Minor dwellings approved
42 decided (1-9 homes)
100%
Major dwellings approved
7 decided (10+ homes)
92%
Change of use approved
36 decided
479
Total decisions
29 refused in the year to March 2026