Demolition of a building at 35 Beeching Road, Bexhill

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Rother Planning Committee on 9 Oct 2025.

RR/2025/1483/DNApproved

What was proposed

The proposal covers securing the area, asbestos removal, dismantling the building, removing foundations, clearing waste and leaving the site level.

“RR/2025/1483/DN 6.4 The proposed method of demolition is described as: i. Secure the demolition area using appropriate fencing. ii. Asbestos removal and disposal by a licenced contractor. iii. Soft-strip, removing all roof coverings, cladding and non-structural elements. iv. Dismantle the above-ground structure. v. Remove foundations and sub-structures.”

“The proposed disposal of soil and rubble is described as: ‘All materials arising from demolition will be neatly stacked on-site for collection and disposal by a registered waste handler.”

Officer report

The site and its setting

The site contains a dilapidated two-storey building, has three existing accesses and is separated from nearby businesses within a commercial area.

“The site (or its setting) does not contain listed buildings, scheduled ancient monuments or any other protected building/structure, as defined in the legislation. Access for demolition can be obtained through one of the three existing accesses (one accessing Wainwright Road, 2 x accessing Beeching Road) so there would be no requirement for special access requirements (e.g. through private property).”

Officer report

What officers recommended

Officers recommended that prior approval was not required because the demolition would not significantly affect local amenities and the site would be made good.

“Prior approval for demolition is not required by virtue of the provisions of the Town & Country Planning General Permitted Development Order Schedule 2, Part 11, Class B. The submitted application details sufficiently demonstrate that the demolition will not result in any significant impact upon local amenities and that the land will be cleared and made good following the demolition works.”

Officer report

What members considered

The committee supported the officer’s recommendation, and a motion that prior approval was not required was proposed and seconded.

“The Planning Committee was supportive of the officer’s recommendation, subject to reasons as outlined below.”

“Councillor Gray moved the motion that prior approval was not required subject to reasons and this was seconded by Councillor McLaren.”

Minutes

The committee’s vote

The motion was carried unanimously, with nine members voting in favour.

“The motion was declared CARRIED (9 for / unanimous).”

Minutes

The decision

The committee decided that prior approval was not required, applying the stated reasons about local amenities, site restoration and the submitted documents.

“This planning decision relates solely to the information contained within the application form, the following plan(s) and (where appropriate) documents: Site Location Plan. Section 5 of the application form (for prior approval). Demolition Statement.”

Minutes

Sources

  • Rother Planning Committee minutes, 9 October 2025
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Rother's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Rother
Date
Thursday 9 October 2025
Committee decided
Approved
Vote
Unanimous
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)

This committee's year

17 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 2 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →