Trent Valley Equestrian Centre Occupation Lane Fiskerton NG25 0TR Data via plota.co.uk

25/02051/DISCON - Formal Discharge of Condition Approved

Proposal

Request for Confirmation of Discharge of Condition 3(Contamination), Condition 4(Drainage Strategy), Condition 5(Materials Details) and Condition 6(Architectural Details) attached to PP Variation to Condition 2(Plans) and Condition 12(In accordance with FRA) of PP Change of use from stables building to single dwelling. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
5 Dec 2025
✓
Validated
18 Dec 2025
✓
Consultation
30 Jan 2026
✓
Approved
4 Mar 2026

Approved on 4 Mar 2026 · Delegated Officer · Last checked 5 Oct 2026

Associated applications 3

  • Part of

    FullApprovedcouncil archive

    Conditions , varied

    • Variationarchive

      Conditions 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 12 discharged

      • ConditionsRequest for Confirmation of Discharge of Condition 3(Contamination), Condition 4(Drainage…This application25/02051/DISCON

Site constraints 3

Flood zone 3, rivers and sea
High chance: a 1 in 100 or greater annual chance from rivers, or 1 in 200 from the sea. Any development here needs a flood risk assessment. Defences are not counted.
The Environment Agency flood map for planning. Homes in zone 3 must also pass the sequential test. Surface water flooding is a separate map.
Flood map ↗
Agricultural land, grade 3b
Not best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Network Expansion Zone
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Not affected
Not green belt · No listed building at the site · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Newark and Sherwood - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Formal Discharge of Condition
Postcode
NG25 0TR
Received
5 Dec 2025
Validated
18 Dec 2025
Ward
Trent
Parish
Fiskerton
Case officer
Show
Target decision
12 Feb 2026
Decision
DOC - All conditions discharged
Decision date
4 Mar 2026
Decision level
Delegated Officer
Applicant
Show
Agent
Joseph kemish Architects LTD

How this decision compares

Decided in 76 days from validation, 24 days slower than Newark and Sherwood's median of 52 for discharge of conditions. Approved, as 95% of discharge of conditions here are.

75%decided within 8 weeks
95%approved
163decided in the last year

Plota live figures for discharge of conditions decided by Newark and Sherwood in the last twelve months, from validation. Newark and Sherwood decision record →

Public comments

No public comments yet.

Last counted 5 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14400631
Planning Portal ref
PP-14400631
Consultation
30 Jan 2026
Statutory expiry
12 Feb 2026
Env. assessment
No
Newark and Sherwood
Planning Authority Score
3.9/10
Below average
#198 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Change of use

Newark and Sherwood is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #241 out of 296. 54% of applications have the time limit extended, above the 41% national average. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (96%) than the national average (90%).

Slower than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Newark and Sherwood decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
92%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #88 of 296
96%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #55 of 296
50%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #241 of 296
54%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #244 of 296
80%
Minor dwellings approved
110 decided (1-9 homes)
88%
Major dwellings approved
25 decided (10+ homes)
82%
Change of use approved
33 decided
767
Total decisions
63 refused in the year to March 2026