Waste yard extension at Dunsmore Brothers, Burnhead Road, Larkhall

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by South Lanarkshire Planning Committee on 11 Aug 2026.

P/26/0321Refused

What was proposed

The applicant sought to change open space into an extension of the existing yard for vehicle parking, manoeuvring and skip storage.

“Change of use of open space to yard space Site Address:”

Officer report

The site

The 1.9-hectare site includes an existing waste facility, disused landfill, woodland, coal-risk areas and green belt land.

“Site Description 2.1. The application site is located off Burnhead Road, between Larkhall and Shawsburn. The site is approximately 1.9 hectares in area, which includes Dunsmore Brothers existing waste management facility and the area of land they are looking to extend into.”

“The additional land partly includes the site of a disused landfill which has now naturalised over, an extensive area of woodland and areas of both Low and High Coal Risk. The site is located in the green belt as designated in the adopted South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2 (SLLDP2).”

Officer report

Planning history

The site had no previous planning history, while the applicant discussed the additional council-owned land with the Estates Service.

“Relevant Planning History 4.1. The site has no previous planning history. However, the area in which they wish to extend is owned by South Lanarkshire Council and the applicant has been in discussions with the Estates Service. Estates have suggested that any decision on the application for the additional land would be conditional on all relevant statutory consents being in place.”

Officer report

Why officers recommended refusal

Officers considered the waste yard extension inappropriate in the green belt, without an essential green belt need or sufficient policy justification.

“NPF4 Policy 8 Green Belts seeks to encourage, promote and facilitate compact urban growth and use the land around our towns and cities sustainably. The policy is twofold, part (i) sets out circumstances where various types of development in the green belt can be considered acceptable and part (ii) looks to protect the green belt and states that reasons must be provided as to why a green belt location is essential and why the proposal cannot be located on an alternative…”

“In terms of Local Development Plan policy, the application site lies within the green belt and is subject to assessment against Policy 4 - Green Belt and Rural Area of the adopted SLLDP2. The policy states that the primary function of the green belt is for agriculture, forestry, recreation and other uses appropriate to the countryside.”

Officer report

Other planning concerns

The proposal lacked biodiversity, tree, coal mining, contaminated land and flood risk information, while woodland clearance would be required.

“Biodiversity Policy 3 of NPF4 outlines that local developments should conserve, restore, and enhance the biodiversity value of a site. The applicant has not submitted a biodiversity statement and, given that a significant area of woodland would have to be cleared for the extension, it is considered that a biodiversity statement should have been submitted providing biodiversity mitigation measures.”

“Other Material Matters The site is within an area that has both low and high coal risk and part of the northern end of the site which has naturalised was formerly used for landfill purposes. As such, a coal mining risk assessment and a contaminated land assessment should have been submitted for assessment with the application. The details provided by these…”

Officer report

Consultation responses

Roads officers objected over missing staff and parking information; SEPA had no objection and other consultees identified information requirements.

“Consultations 6.1. Roads, Transportation and Fleet Services (Development Management) – have objected on grounds of lack of information relating to staff numbers and no parking layout. Response: Noted…”

“Scottish Environmental Protection Agency (SEPA) – no objection. Response: Noted…”

Officer report

Neighbour views

No representations were received during neighbour notification and advertisement.

“Representations 7.1. Following the statutory period of neighbour notification and advertisement, no representations have been received.”

Officer report

The decision

The committee refused the application for the reasons detailed in the officer report.

“P/26/0321 for Change of Use of Open Space to Yard Space at Dunsmore Brothers, Burnhead Road, Larkhall A report dated 3 August 2026 by the Executive Director (Community and Enterprise Resources) was submitted on planning application P/26/0321 by [the applicant] for the change of use of open space to yard space at Dunsmore Brothers, Burnhead Road, Larkhall.”

“The Committee decided: that planning application P/26/0321 by [the applicant] for the change of use of open space to yard space at Dunsmore Brothers, Burnhead Road, Larkhall be refused for the reasons detailed in the Executive Director’s report.”

Minutes

Sources

  • South Lanarkshire Planning Committee minutes, 11 August 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of South Lanarkshire's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Date
Tuesday 11 August 2026
Recommendation
Officers recommended refusal
Committee decided
Refused
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)

This committee's year

57 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 2 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →