Children's home extension at 128 Hereson Road, Ramsgate

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Thanet Planning Committee on 16 Sept 2026.

F/TH/26/0630Approved

What is proposed

A single-storey rear extension and rear dormer would improve kitchen, staff, utility, shower and bedroom facilities at the children’s home.

“The application seeks planning permission for the erection of a single storey rear extension together with a rear dormer window.”

“The rear extension will replace the existing conservatory at the rear of the property and will be L shaped, wrapping around the existing two storey rear extension. It will have a depth of between 4m and 9.5m and a width of between 2.4m and 6.1m, and a flat roof with a height of 2.9m. A parapet feature with a height of 3.3m is proposed along the northern elevation of the extension and will form the boundary of the site with St George’s Road.”

Officer report

The site and its use

The site is a two-storey end-of-terrace property used as a children’s home for three children and two staff members.

“The application site comprises a two storey, end of terrace property located on the western side of Hereson Road, south of the junction with St George’s Road. The building has been previously extended at the rear, and features a rear garden that runs parallel to St George’s Road.”

“The building is in use as a children’s home, which houses three children and two staff members. The children’s home has been in operation since 2001. The surrounding area is mainly residential in nature, featuring properties of similar scales and designs.”

Officer report

Planning history

The property became a children’s home for three children in 2001 after earlier permission for a residential dwelling in 1991.

“F/TH/01/0218 - Change of use to children’s home for 3 children in accordance with Section 73A(2)(a) - Granted 19.04.2001”

“F/TH/91/0497 - Change of use and conversion from shop with ancillary living accommodation to form one single residential dwelling house - Granted 25.10.1991”

Officer report

Officer recommendation

Officers recommended approval because the extensions would improve facilities without harming the area’s character or neighbouring living conditions.

“The proposed extensions will improve facilities provided within the existing children’s home, without causing harm to the character and appearance of the area. The concerns of neighbours regarding noise and disturbance and anti-social behaviour are noted, but taking into account that the occupancy of the home will not increase as part of this application, the scheme is not considered to result in any additional harm to the living conditions of neighbours.”

“It is therefore recommended that Members approve the application, subject to safeguarding conditions.”

Officer report

Consultation and objections

Four objections cited long-standing noise, disturbance and antisocial behaviour, while consultees raised no objections to the proposed extensions.

“* Operation of children’s home has resulted in significant noise and disturbance, harassment and antisocial behaviour over the last 30 years, detrimental to neighbouring residents. * Development will increase resident numbers and therefore inevitably intensify the existing problems, leading to increased noise, more frequent disturbance, additional vehicle movements, and greater pressure on the surrounding residential area.”

“TDC Environmental Health: Officers note that five complaints have been received from two neighbouring properties over the application site’s history relating to noise and antisocial behaviour associated with the operation of the Children’s Home. However, these complaints relate to the existing, lawful use of the property, which is not altered or intensified by this application; the proposal does not increase the registered occupancy of the home.”

Officer report

Concerns about neighbours

Officers considered that occupancy would not increase, construction impacts would be temporary, and the extensions would not cause additional harmful overlooking, overshadowing or disturbance.

“The application site is surrounded by residential properties. Considering the impact of the proposed extensions upon attached property, No. 126 first, it is noted that the proposed rear extension will project along the common boundary with this neighbouring property. It will project no further than the existing conservatory present at the site, and following amendments to the extension removing the parapet wall proposed along the boundary with No.”

“Concern has been raised by a neighbour regarding overlooking into their garden during the construction of the development. The construction process is temporary, and whilst scaffolding will need to be erected to install the dormer window, views from this scaffolding into neighbouring gardens will only be for a limited period. As such, this impact is not considered to be especially harmful.”

Officer report

The committee vote

The committee agreed the motion to approve, voting 12 for, none against and with no abstentions.

“Councillor Rusiecki proposed and Councillor Boyd seconded that the officer recommendation to APPROVE be agreed, subject to the following conditions:”

“When put to the vote the motion was AGREED.”

Minutes

The decision

The application was approved subject to conditions covering commencement, approved drawings and matching external materials and finishes.

“3 The external materials and external finishes to be used in the development hereby approved shall be of the same colour, finish and texture as those on the existing property.”

Minutes

Councillors at the meeting

Also attending Marlène Dasburg Labour, Ruth Duckworth Labour

Source: Plota analysis of the council's minutes; parties from the council's list of councillors.

Sources

  • Thanet Planning Committee minutes, 16 September 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Thanet's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Thanet
Date
Wednesday 16 September 2026
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Councillors
12Labour 7Conservative 2Green 2Reform UK 1Show councillors
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)

This committee's year

95 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 2 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →