Zones 1 And 2 Gateway 14 Gostling Avenue Stowmarket Data via plota.co.uk

DC/26/01623 - Advertisement Approved

Proposal

Application for consent to display an Advertisement(s) - Installation of 2No. Freestanding single marketing boards Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
16 Apr 2026
✓
Validated
5 May 2026
✓
Consultation
7 May 2026
✓
Committee
17 Jun 2026
✓
Approved
17 Jun 2026

Approved on 17 Jun 2026 · Committee · Last checked 19 Jul 2026

Planning committee

Decided by Babergh Mid Suffolk Mid Suffolk Planning Committee on 17 Jun 2026.

Approved unanimously

As officers recommended.

  • Officers advised approval because the signs would not harm amenity or public safety.
  • No objections or other comments were received, while highways and environmental health raised no objection.
  • The committee voted unanimously to grant advertisement consent with conditions.
Read how the committee decided The proposal, site, officer assessment, consultation responses, committee debate, vote and decision.

Source: Plota analysis of Babergh Mid Suffolk's committee minutes of 17 Jun 2026.

Site constraints 2

Agricultural land, grade 2
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Also on the record
1 listed building within 150 m.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 25 September 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Babergh Mid Suffolk - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Advertisement
Received
16 Apr 2026
Validated
5 May 2026
Ward
Stow Thorney
Parish
Creeting St Peter
Case officer
Show
Target decision
30 Jun 2026
Decision
Granted
Decision date
17 Jun 2026
Decision level
Committee
Applicant
Show
Agent
Jaynic

How this decision compares

Decided in 43 days from validation, 10 days faster than Babergh Mid Suffolk's median of 53 for signs and adverts. Approved, as 88% of signs and adverts here are.

81%decided within 8 weeks
88%approved
28decided in the last year

Plota live figures for signs and adverts decided by Babergh Mid Suffolk in the last twelve months, from validation. Babergh Mid Suffolk decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14791259
Consultation
7 May 2026
Env. assessment
No
Babergh Mid Suffolk
Planning Authority Score
7.7/10
Good
#33 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Other decisions

Babergh Mid Suffolk is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #56 out of 296. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (95%) than the national average (90%).

Faster than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Babergh Mid Suffolk decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
89%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #124 of 296
95%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #68 of 296
77%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #56 of 296
34%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #83 of 296
74%
Minor dwellings approved
160 decided (1-9 homes)
73%
Major dwellings approved
11 decided (10+ homes)
93%
Change of use approved
40 decided
882
Total decisions
99 refused in the year to March 2026