Church auditorium extension at Horley Baptist Church, Horley
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Reigate Planning Committee on 23 Jul 2026.
What was proposed
The application proposed a 320-seat worship auditorium and ancillary spaces as an extension to the existing church.
“This is a full application for the erection of a new auditorium worship space (Planning Use Class F1) by extending the existing Horley Baptist Church. The proposed auditorium would seat 320 unfixed seats on one level and ancillary support space.”
Officer report
Earlier planning permission
A 2012 permission covered a church and care home, with the auditorium intended as a later phase that was never built.
“Planning permission was granted in 2012 (ref: 11/02187/F) for demolition of an existing school and caretaker's building and the erection of a care home and church with access, car parking and landscaping arrangements. The first part of the church and care home (Amherst Care Home adjacent) were constructed, with the auditorium part intended to be constructed under ‘phase two’ of the development, to accommodate 320 seats on two levels.”
Officer report
Consultation responses
The town council raised parking concerns, while other consultees raised no objection or had no comments; ecology requested conditions.
“Horley Town Council: No objections, however as the current car park will not be extended, HTC has concerns over the impact on parking in local roads as the enhanced facility will attract a greater number of attendees. HTC also presumes that the applicant will be required to submit a travel plan.”
“SCC Ecology: no objection in relation to BNG – conditions required…”
Officer report
Residents’ concerns
Three responses raised concerns about outlook, overshadowing, parking, traffic, congestion, highway safety and overdevelopment.
“Issue Response Loss of a private view This is not a material planning consideration Overbearing relationship and loss of outlook See paragraph 6.7 Overshadowing See paragraph 6.7 Inadequate parking See paragraph 6.8 – 6.13 Increase in traffic and congestion See paragraph 6.8 – 6.13 Hazard to highway safety See paragraph 6.8 – 6.13 Overdevelopment See paragraph 6.6”
Officer report
What members discussed
Members supported the design but discussed seating, parking pressures, weekday events, sustainable travel and drainage arrangements.
“Parking, transport and drainage matters were discussed. Members noted the 34 parking spaces allocated to the church currently which would not increase. They welcomed arrangements proposed in the report for the use of nearby Manorfields School parking facilities on Sundays. Officers noted that this would be reflected in the updated Travel Plan in view of the additional parking arrangement to manage parking demand as well as a condition for secure cycle parking.”
“Concerns were raised regarding the potential impact of additional numbers to church services such as funerals which could lead to increased traffic and parking issues along the road. Members felt this could be a problem during church services and events held during the week or during school hours when access to school parking might be restricted.”
Minutes
The committee’s decision
The committee granted permission subject to the report’s conditions and addendum, with an additional request about weekday parking alternatives.
“RESOLVED that planning permission be GRANTED subject to conditions as set out in the report’s recommendation and addendum.”
“In addition: Members requested an additional informative advising the applicant to investigate alternative parking arrangements for weekday use of the church when the arrangement with the school is not possible.”
Minutes
The members' reasons
“Members felt this could be a problem during church services and events held during the week or during school hours when access to school parking might be restricted.”
“Whilst concerns remained about parking pressures associated with increased attendance at the church, Members considered that the proposal complied with relevant planning policies and that these matters could be managed through the proposed conditions and an updated Travel Plan.”
Minutes
Source: the council's minutes, quoted word for word.
Sources
- Reigate Planning Committee minutes, 23 July 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Reigate's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Committee
- Reigate Planning Committee
- Council
- Reigate
- Date
- Thursday 23 July 2026
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- View application →
- All decisions
- Reigate committee decisions →
This committee's year
26 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 2 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.