Land South of Queen Elizabeth Walk, Barnes Data via plota.co.uk

PA26/3725 - Telecommunications apps prior approval Registered

Proposal

The installation of a 17.5m monopole supporting 6no. antennas, the installation of 2no. equipment cabinets, and ancillary works thereto. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
30 Oct 2026
✓
Validated
2 Nov 2026
Decision
Expected by 22 Dec 2026

Under consideration

No decision has been issued yet. Plota predicts a decision around 7 Dec 2026, from Richmond upon Thames's recent prior approvals.

Site constraints 26

Heliport Restr All over 150m All buildings exceeding 150m (492.1ft) AGLRichm Highway Status Highways Publicly MaintainedArticle 4 directionRichm Protected View (Indicative Zone) RICHMOND PARK TOWARDS ST PAULS CATHEDRALRichm Thames Policy Area Thames Policy AreaRichm Susceptibe Ground Water Flood >= 50% <75%Richmond CIL HigherRichm Village Boundary Barnes VillageRichm Village Character Area Barn Elms, Rocks Lane - Character Area 4Richm Area Benefiting Flood Defence EA Areas Benefiting from DefencesRichm Arch P English HeritageRichm Proposed For Tree Planting Barnes Elms Playing Fields 1999Floodzone 3 - Tidal ModelsFloodzone 2 Tidal Models
Flood zone 3, rivers and sea
High chance: a 1 in 100 or greater annual chance from rivers, or 1 in 200 from the sea. Any development here needs a flood risk assessment. Defences are not counted.
The Environment Agency flood map for planning. Homes in zone 3 must also pass the sequential test. Surface water flooding is a separate map.
Flood map ↗
National infrastructure project: Thames Tideway Tunnel
The site is inside the project boundary. Waste water treatment, decided. The project page says whether consent was granted.
Nationally significant infrastructure projects (power stations, electricity lines, pipelines, major roads and railways, harbours, airports and reservoirs) are consented by a Secretary of State under the Planning Act 2008, after an examination by the Planning Inspectorate, rather than by the council. The boundary is the one the Inspectorate consults on and can change as the scheme does. Projects are shown within 2 km of the site.
Planning Inspectorate project page ↗
Agricultural land, grade 3a
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. A site survey can differ.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Archaeological priority area
An assessment or field evaluation may be asked for before ground works.
The council or Historic England considers archaeology likely here. A desk-based assessment, and sometimes trial trenching, can be asked for with the application.
Air quality management area: Richmond AQMA
The council has declared the area as failing an air quality objective.
Schemes that add traffic, parking or combustion plant are assessed against the area's action plan and may need an air quality assessment.
Council record ↗
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 2
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
SSSI 196 m away: Barn Elms Wetland Centre SSSI
Natural England may need consulting, depending on what is proposed.
Sites of special scientific interest are the best wildlife and geological sites in the country. Development likely to harm one is rarely permitted.
Heliport Restr All over 150m All buildings exceeding 150m (492.1ft) AGLCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Richm Highway Status Highways Publicly MaintainedCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Article 4 directionCouncil record
Some permitted development rights are withdrawn. The direction is on the council's register but not published as open data.
Council site ↗
Richm Protected View (Indicative Zone) RICHMOND PARK TOWARDS ST PAULS CATHEDRALCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Richm Thames Policy Area Thames Policy AreaCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Richm Susceptibe Ground Water Flood >= 50% <75%Council record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Richmond CIL HigherCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Richm Village Boundary Barnes VillageCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Richm Village Character Area Barn Elms, Rocks Lane - Character Area 4Council record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Richm Area Benefiting Flood Defence EA Areas Benefiting from DefencesCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Richm Arch P English Heritage: Possible site of a medieval moated manor and laCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Richm Proposed For Tree Planting Barnes Elms Playing Fields 1999Council record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Floodzone 3 - Tidal ModelsCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Floodzone 2 Tidal ModelsCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Also on the record
Local nature reserve 421 m away: Barnes Common; Conservation area 87 m away: Barnes Green; Public transport access: PTAL 2 (poor), TfL 2023, for the 100 m square; Priority habitat 13 m away: Good quality semi improved grassland; Metropolitan Open Land 12 m away.
Not affected
Not green belt · No listed building at the site · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 2 November 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Planning Inspectorate, Transport for London (public transport access levels, Powered by TfL Open Data, OGL v3.0, contains OS data © Crown copyright and database right 2025) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Richmond upon Thames - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Telecommunications apps prior approval
Received
30 Oct 2026
Validated
2 Nov 2026
Ward
Barnes Ward [BRN]
Case officer
Show
Target decision
22 Dec 2026
Applicant
Show
Agent
M Group Ltd

Decision outlook

Day 9 of the 56-day target. Richmond upon Thames usually decides prior approvals by day 35.

Day 947 days to the 56-day target
98%decided within 8 weeks
73%approved
157decided in the last year

Plota live figures for prior approvals decided by Richmond upon Thames in the last twelve months, from validation. Richmond upon Thames decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-15336984
Statutory expiry
23 Nov 2026
Richmond upon Thames
Planning Authority Score
4.4/10
Below average
#182 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Richmond upon Thames ranks #130 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Richmond upon Thames is also one of the strictest councils - it refuses more householder applications than almost any other, with only 82% approved vs 90% nationally.

One of the strictest councils
only 82% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Richmond upon Thames decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
81%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #257 of 296
82%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #268 of 296
69%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #130 of 296
35%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #104 of 296
68%
Minor dwellings approved
181 decided (1-9 homes)
100%
Major dwellings approved
3 decided (10+ homes)
47%
Change of use approved
17 decided
1,888
Total decisions
358 refused in the year to March 2026