196-home phase 2 replan at Ankerbold Road, Old Tupton
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by North East Derbyshire Planning Committee on 28 Jul 2026.
No officer report was published for this decision; this summary is from the committee minutes.
What was proposed
The application proposed a replan adding 49 plots to Phase 2, creating 196 homes with varied house types and off-street parking.
“The Committee considered an application that had been submitted for the proposed replan of the site (Planning approval 18/00056/FL), with an additional 49 plots bringing the total number of plots to 196 for Phase 2, including a mixture of bungalows, 1 bed maisonettes, 2, 3 and 4 bedroom houses, all with off street parking (Major Development) (Amended Plans) at Land to the North and West of the Poplars, Ankerbold Road, Old Tupton.”
Minutes
Site and planning history
The site was within Tupton’s settlement boundary, allocated for housing, and had permission for 193 homes, with 46 under construction or occupied.
“The report highlighted that the application site lay within the settlement developments limits for Tupton and was allocated for housing under the Local Plan. The site had an extant permission for 193 dwellings of which the first 46 were under construction or occupied.”
Minutes
What officers recommended
Officers recommended conditional approval, citing established residential development, housing delivery, affordable homes, contributions and viability evidence.
“Officers accepted that although the proposal did not fully comply with Policy LC2 or secure all requested planning obligations, an independent viability assessment confirmed that the negotiated package represented a reasonable balance between development delivery and mitigation.”
Minutes
What people said
The Committee heard from an objector, a supporter and the agent before considering the application.
“Before the Committee considered the application it heard from an objector, Dean Jones, supporter, Stuart Ellis, and the agent, Jon Bradbury.”
Minutes
Members’ debate
Members discussed Section 106 allocations, hospital funding, local highway improvements and the viability negotiations.
“Committee discussed the application, Members sought clarification from officers regarding the proposed Section 106 allocation and queried why the hospital had not been included within the allocation. Officers advised that the hospital's application had not met the necessary requirements. Members further enquired whether discussions were ongoing with the hospital to address this issue.”
“Members also queried whether the highway-related Section 106 contributions could be directed towards more local improvements, including potential speed limit reductions. Officers confirmed that the proposed use of the Section 106 contributions could be considered further, with an amendment to the recommendation to facilitate this.”
Minutes
The vote
A motion to grant permission in line with the officer recommendation was proposed, seconded and approved.
“At the conclusion of the discussion Councillor T Lacey and Councillor K Rouse moved and seconded a Motion to grant the application, in line with officer recommendation. The Motion was put to a vote and approved.”
Minutes
The decision
Planning permission was conditionally approved, subject to funding discussions, a legal agreement and the report’s conditions and informatives.
“4 That planning permission be conditionally approved subject to:”
“The conditions and informatives set out in the report, with the final wording of the conditions delegated to the Planning Manager (Development Management).”
Minutes
Councillors at the meeting
- Lee HartshorneChairLabourFor(no vote against recorded)
- Tony LaceyVice-ChairLabourFor(no vote against recorded)
- Neil BakerConservativeFor(no vote against recorded)
- David CheethamLabourFor(no vote against recorded)
- Andrew CooperIndependentFor(no vote against recorded)
- Christine GareLabourFor(no vote against recorded)
- Fran PetersenLabourFor(no vote against recorded)
- Kathy RouseLabourFor(no vote against recorded)
The minutes record this decision with no vote against, so each member present for this item is shown as voting for it.
Apologies William Jones Conservative, David Hancock NED IND
Source: Plota analysis of the council's minutes; parties from the council's list of councillors.
Sources
- North East Derbyshire Planning Committee minutes, 28 July 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of North East Derbyshire's committee minutes. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Council
- North East Derbyshire
- Date
- Tuesday 28 July 2026
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Councillors
- 8Labour 6Conservative 1Independent 1Show votes
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- View application →
- All decisions
- North East Derbyshire committee decisions →
This committee's year
13 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.