Improved agricultural access track at Moreton Road, near, Aston Tirrold
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by South Oxfordshire Planning Committee on 26 Oct 2026.
What was proposed
The retrospective proposal covers two field gates, fencing, a splayed hardstanding and a 33-metre surfaced track into the field.
“PROPOSAL 2.1 The application proposes a pair of 3.2m wide metal field gates with post and wire fencing on both sides set back 7.2m from the edge of the highway, a splayed hardstanding in front of the gates and a hard surfaced track extending approximately 33m into the field. The hardstanding and track include the laying of additional hardcore and topping with road planings.”
Officer report
The site
The access and track serve a 2.7-hectare field beside Moreton Road within the North Wessex Downs National Landscape.
“The application seeks planning permission for "Amendments to an existing access and laying of hardstanding to improve an existing track" at Aston Farm, Moreton Road, Aston Tirrold, OX11 9AW. The application is retrospective with the works having started on 12 March 2026 and having been completed on 14 March 2026.”
“The site is located on the west side of Moreton Road, approximately midway between South Moreton and Aston Upthorpe. The access and track serve a field of approximately 2.7 hectares, which is surrounded by a larger field in agricultural use. To the north of the site, an electricity transmission line crosses the larger field on a north-west to south-east axis.”
Officer report
Earlier planning history
Earlier applications for a dwelling and agricultural storage buildings were refused, while a later agricultural building application remained undetermined.
“P80/W0179 - Planning permission was refused on 4 June 1980 for "Erection of agricultural storage building".”
“P26/S4059/FUL - An application for planning permission for “Erection of an agricultural building, extension to agricultural track and laying of associated hardstanding” was received on 10 September 2026. The application is currently the subject of consultation and publicity and has yet to be determined.”
Officer report
Consultees and residents
The parish council objected, while highways and contaminated-land consultees raised no objection and ecology supported approval with planting; five public responses objected.
“Consultees Aston Tirrold Parish Council - Objection for the following reasons: 1. No agricultural justification for the track to be improved; 2. No technical justification in highways terms for the new entrance; 3. Planning permission may be required for moveable structures on the land; 4. Retention of any existing buildings or structures must be subject to an application for a Lawful Development Certificate; 5.”
Officer report
Who spoke
A parish council representative, a supporter of the application and the ward member spoke to the committee.
What members debated
Members discussed controlling the land’s future use, possible harm to the national landscape, the longstanding track, improved gate safety and the limits of this application.
“Members debated the application querying whether it would be possible to include a condition specifying what the field and hardstanding could be used for. Committee were advised that this was not necessary as it was already designated as agricultural land.”
“5 Members acknowledged that there had been a track on the land in the same position for some time and that, by moving the position of the gate, the applicant had improved highway safety.”
Minutes
The vote
A motion to approve the application was carried after the committee extended its meeting to finish considering the item.
“Committee voted to extend the meeting in order to complete consideration of this item.”
“A motion, proposed by Councillor Arlett, and seconded by Councillor Macdonald, to approve the application was carried on being put to the vote.”
Minutes
The decision
Planning application P26/S1798/FUL was approved subject to the conditions set out in the report.
“RESOLVED: to approve planning application P26/S1798/FUL subject to the conditions set out in the report.”
Minutes
The members' reasons
“Members expressed concern over potential harm to the national landscape. 5 Members acknowledged that there had been a track on the land in the same position for some time and that, by moving the position of the gate, the applicant had improved highway safety.”
“Members noted that they could only consider the application in front of them and could not debate what could happen with the land in the future.”
Minutes
Source: the council's minutes, quoted word for word.
Councillors at the meeting
- David BrethertonChairLib Dem
- Ken ArlettResidents
- Peter DragonettiGreen
- Katharine Keats-RohanLib Dem
- Axel MacdonaldLabour
- Peter RamsdaleLib Dem
- Ed SadlerLib Dem
- Crispin ToppingLib Dem
Proposed by Councillor Ken Arlett, seconded by Councillor Axel Macdonald.
Apologies James Norman Green, Jo Robb Green
Also attending Anne-Marie Simpson Lib Dem
Source: Plota analysis of the council's minutes; parties from the council's list of councillors.
Sources
- South Oxfordshire Planning Committee minutes, 26 October 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of South Oxfordshire's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Committee
- South Oxfordshire Planning Committee
- Council
- South Oxfordshire
- Date
- Monday 26 October 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Councillors
- 8Lib Dem 5Green 1Residents 1Labour 1Show councillors
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- View application →
- All decisions
- South Oxfordshire committee decisions →
This committee's year
51 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 2 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.