Redundant Building Adj To Park Lodge Pengersick Lane Praa Sands Penzance Cornwall TR20 9SQ Data via plota.co.uk

PA25/08683 - Full application Refused

Proposal

Demolition of former commercial premises; Erection of a pair of semi-detached dwellings Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
around 10 Dec 2025
✓
Consultation
22 Dec 2025
✗
Refused
23 Apr 2026
Appeal
Not lodged

Refused on 23 Apr 2026 · Peer Sign Off · Last checked 8 Oct 2026

Site constraints 7

Cornwall National Landscape
Great weight to conserving the landscape; major development restricted.
Previously an area of outstanding natural beauty, which is still the designation in law. Since 2023 authorities must seek to further its purpose, not merely have regard to it.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 1
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Radon affected area, class 6
An estimated 30% or more of homes reach the radon action level. Indicative for the 1 km square, which takes the highest class found in it; a radon test gives the answer for a building.
From the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency indicative atlas. Under building regulations, as the BRE guide BR 211 (2023) sets out, new buildings and extensions need basic radon protection from class 3 in England and Wales and from class 2 in Scotland, and full protection from class 5. The class at the site itself, from the detailed BGS map, decides which.
UKHSA radon ↗
Also on the record
Scheduled monument 170 m away: Pengersick Castle and associated building platform; Conservation area 90 m away: Pengersick; Inside the Praa Sands built-up area; Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) had this area as grade 3, but it predates the buildings here and the current map does not class it as farmland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No listed building at the site

Checked on 8 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Cornwall - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Cornwall
Application type
Full application
Postcode
TR20 9SQ
Received
around 10 Dec 2025
Validated
10 Dec 2025
Ward
Porthleven, Breage And Germoe
Parish
Breage
Case officer
Show
Target decision
4 Feb 2026
Decision
Refused
Decision date
23 Apr 2026
Decision level
Peer Sign Off
Applicant
Show

How this decision compares

Decided in 134 days from validation, 79 days slower than Cornwall's median of 55 for full applications. Refused, as 4% of full applications here are.

77%decided within 8 weeks
96%approved
100%go to committee

Plota live figures for full applications decided by Cornwall in the last twelve months, from validation. Cornwall decision record →

Public comments

16comments received
13 objecting3 supporting

81% object · above the UK average of 74%

Last counted 8 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14477959
Planning Portal ref
PP-14477959
Comments by
12 Jan 2026
Site or press notice
22 Dec 2025
Statutory expiry
4 Feb 2026
Env. assessment
No
Cornwall
Planning Authority Score
7.9/10
Good
#28 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Cornwall is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #64 out of 296. Householder applications are more likely to be approved here than most councils, with a 97% approval rate vs 90% nationally.

More permissive than most councils
97% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Cornwall decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
92%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #79 of 296
97%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #28 of 296
76%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #64 of 296
35%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #101 of 296
82%
Minor dwellings approved
1180 decided (1-9 homes)
94%
Major dwellings approved
67 decided (10+ homes)
93%
Change of use approved
194 decided
4,839
Total decisions
363 refused in the year to March 2026