Two-storey side extension at 68 Clarendon Road, Audenshaw

What was proposed

The application proposed a two-storey side extension, single-storey rear extension and front porch, with the conservatory and garage removed.

“Proposal: Proposed Two Storey Side Extension, Single Storey Rear Extension, Bay Window Extension to the Principal Elevation, Hip to Gable Roof Alteration…”

“Planning permission is sought for enlargements to the existing dwellinghouse, including a two-storey side extension, single storey rear extension and front porch extension. To facilitate the development this existing conservatory to the rear and garage to the east elevation are to be removed.”

Officer report

The site and surroundings

The property is a two-storey semi-detached house in a mainly residential area, with two driveway parking spaces and gardens to the front and rear.

“The application property benefits from off street parking provided by the driveway, with provisions for no.2 vehicular parking spaces. To the principal elevation, alongside the driveway is a moderate garden area present with vegetation, which is retained by a dwarf red brick wall and hedges. To the rear is a moderate enclosed garden and existing conservatory extension.”

“Neighbouring property no.70 adjoins the property to the west, to the rear properties along Charles Avenue and to the east neighbouring property no.66 shared a common boundary. The surrounding area is predominately residential with some commercial uses within the wider vicinity along Manchester Road and St Annes RC Primary School to the southwest.”

Officer report

Consultation responses

The Local Highway Authority raised no objection, while 92 letters objected and one letter neither supported nor opposed the application.

“In response to the application, a total of 93 letters of representation have been received from third parties. 92no. letters of objection have been received. 1no. Letter has been received which neither supports nor objects to the development. Page 86”

“One letter was received which neither supported nor objected to the application, the matters within which have been summarised as follows: Page 88”

Officer report

Residents’ concerns

Residents raised concerns about overdevelopment, loss of light, possible HMO use, noise, parking, refuse storage and construction impacts.

“Overshadowing Loss of Light The proposed extensions, particularly the increased massing and height, are likely to result in a significant loss of natural light to neighbouring properties. Overshadowing will negatively impact habitable rooms and outdoor amenity spaces, reducing residents' quality of life. This runs contrary to established planning principles which seek to safeguard adequate daylight and sunlight for neighbouring occupiers.”

“Noise and Disturbance The development would result in increased levels of noise and general disturbance from additional residents, vehicle movements, deliveries, and associated activity. This would have a detrimental effect on neighbouring properties and would significantly reduce the peaceful enjoyment currently experienced by local residents…”

Officer report

Who spoke

The local Ward Member and another speaker addressed the Panel in objection to the application.

The decision

“to defer the application, to allow officers to reconsult with the applicant regarding concerns with scale, layout and design of the proposed extensions. Application No. and Name”

Minutes, 22 Jul 2026