STREET RECORD Mill Lane To Sewage Works Askham Bryan York Data via plota.co.uk

26/01568/TCMAS - Telecommunication Mast Notice Awaiting decision

Proposal

Installation of 22.5m high telecommunications monopole supporting 3no. antennas and 2no. dishes, equipment cabinet, meter cabinet and associated ancillary development Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
24 Aug 2026
Decision
Expected by 18 Oct 2026

Under consideration

No decision has been issued yet. Plota predicted a decision soon after comments close on 22 Sept 2026; it is now day 46.

The consultation period closed on 22 Sept 2026.

Documents 23

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 4

Green belt: York
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.
Read the government guidance ↗
Agricultural land, grade 3a, surveyed
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: Natural England's post-1988 ALC field survey (Leeds). Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Survey report ↗
Also on the record
Coalfield, development low risk area; Inside the Askham Bryan built-up area.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No listed building at the site · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Mining Remediation Authority and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in York - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
York
Application type
Telecommunication Mast Notice
Received
24 Aug 2026
Validated
24 Aug 2026
Ward
Rural West York
Parish
Askham Bryan Parish Council
Case officer
Show
Target decision
18 Oct 2026
Applicant
Show
Agent
WHP Telecoms

Decision outlook

Day 46, past York's usual 19 days for prior approvals. 98% are decided within thirteen weeks, so most likely by 23 Nov 2026.

Day 4610 days to the 56-day target
97%decided within 8 weeks
94%approved
122decided in the last year

Plota live figures for prior approvals decided by York in the last twelve months, from validation. York decision record →

Public comments

1comment received
3 supporting

1 neighbour consulted · Last counted 7 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-15180957
Planning Portal ref
PP-15180957
Comments by
22 Sept 2026
Statutory expiry
18 Oct 2026
Env. assessment
No
York
Planning Authority Score
3.7/10
Below average
#213 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

York ranks #156 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Householder applications are slightly less likely to be approved here (87%) than the national average (90%).

These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
York decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
82%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #255 of 296
87%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #237 of 296
64%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #156 of 296
42%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #168 of 296
69%
Minor dwellings approved
104 decided (1-9 homes)
71%
Major dwellings approved
17 decided (10+ homes)
63%
Change of use approved
68 decided
1,278
Total decisions
224 refused in the year to March 2026