LITTLE CLIFFSEND FARM Chalk Hill, Ramsgate, Kent, CT12 5HP Data via plota.co.uk

F/TH/24/1167 - Full Planning Permission Approved

Proposal

Formation of internal access roads (part-retrospective) Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
4 Oct 2024
✓
Validated
24 Oct 2024
✓
Committee
20 May 2026
✓
Approved
21 May 2026

Approved on 21 May 2026 · Planning Committee Decision · Last checked 1 Oct 2026

Planning committee

Decided by Thanet Planning Committee on 20 May 2026.

Approved

As officers recommended.

  • Officers advised approval because the roads would support farm maintenance, cause no significant harm, and could provide biodiversity net gain.
  • Residents objected to the retrospective works, countryside and wildlife impacts, footpath effects, cliff stability, noise, dust and possible future housing.
  • The committee agreed approval by seven votes to two, with two abstentions, subject to the stated conditions.
Read how the committee decided The proposed roads, site history, officers’ assessment, objections, speakers, committee vote and decision.

Source: Plota analysis of Thanet's committee minutes of 20 May 2026.

Documents 58

Decision & officer reports 1

Consultation & comments 44

PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation/Response · 21 Apr 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation/Response · 14 Apr 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation/Response · 23 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF OBJECTION Representation/Response · 18 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation/Response · 16 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation/Response · 2 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation/Response · 26 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation/Response · 10 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation/Response · 6 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF OBJECTION Representation/Response · 14 Apr 2025 View ↗ PDF OBJECTION Representation/Response · 13 Jan 2025 View ↗ PDF OBJECTION Representation/Response · 12 Dec 2024 View ↗ PDF OBJECTION Representation/Response · 9 Dec 2024 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation/Response · 5 Dec 2024 View ↗
PDF OBJECTION Representation/Response · 4 Dec 2024 View ↗ PDF OBJECTION Representation/Response · 2 Dec 2024 View ↗ PDF OBJECTION Representation/Response · 2 Dec 2024 View ↗ PDF OBJECTION Representation/Response · 2 Dec 2024 View ↗ PDF OBJECTION Representation/Response · 2 Dec 2024 View ↗ PDF OBJECTION Representation/Response · 2 Dec 2024 View ↗ PDF OBJECTION Representation/Response · 2 Dec 2024 View ↗ PDF OBJECTION Representation/Response · 2 Dec 2024 View ↗ PDF OBJECTION Representation/Response · 2 Dec 2024 View ↗ PDF OBJECTION Representation/Response · 2 Dec 2024 View ↗ PDF OBJECTION Representation/Response · 2 Dec 2024 View ↗ PDF OBJECTION Representation/Response · 2 Dec 2024 View ↗ PDF OBJECTION Representation/Response · 2 Dec 2024 View ↗ PDF OBJECTION Representation/Response · 2 Dec 2024 View ↗ PDF OBJECTION Representation/Response · 2 Dec 2024 View ↗ PDF OBJECTION Representation/Response · 2 Dec 2024 View ↗ PDF OBJECTION Representation/Response · 2 Dec 2024 View ↗ PDF OBJECTION Representation/Response · 2 Dec 2024 View ↗ PDF OBJECTION Representation/Response · 2 Dec 2024 View ↗ PDF OBJECTION Representation/Response · 2 Dec 2024 View ↗ PDF OBJECTION Representation/Response · 29 Nov 2024 View ↗ PDF OBJECTION Representation/Response · 27 Nov 2024 View ↗ PDF OBJECTION Representation/Response · 27 Nov 2024 View ↗ PDF OBJECTION Representation/Response · 27 Nov 2024 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation/Response · 13 Nov 2024 View ↗
PDF OBJECTION Representation/Response · 12 Nov 2024 View ↗ PDF OBJECTION Representation/Response · 7 Nov 2024 View ↗ PDF OBJECTION Representation/Response · 5 Nov 2024 View ↗ PDF OBJECTION Representation/Response · 4 Nov 2024 View ↗ PDF OBJECTION Representation/Response · 3 Jul 2024 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 6

Article 4 direction
Ramsgate ED. Named permitted development rights are withdrawn here.
An Article 4 direction withdraws particular permitted development rights, so work that would normally need no application needs one here. Not every council has published its directions.
Agricultural land, grade 2
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Special area of conservation about 105 m away: Thanet Coast
Work nearby can need a habitats assessment.
Harm to a protected site is only accepted where there is no alternative and an overriding public interest.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 1
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
SSSI about 105 m away: Sandwich Bay to Hacklinge Marshes SSSI
Natural England may need consulting, depending on what is proposed.
Sites of special scientific interest are the best wildlife and geological sites in the country. Development likely to harm one is rarely permitted.
Also on the record
1 listed building within 150 m of the postcode pin.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 26 September 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Thanet - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Thanet
Application type
Full Planning Permission
Postcode
CT12 5HP
Received
4 Oct 2024
Validated
24 Oct 2024
Ward
Cliffsend And Pegwell
Parish
Ramsgate Civil Parish
Case officer
Show
Target decision
24 Apr 2026
Decision
Grant Permission
Decision date
21 May 2026
Decision level
Planning Committee Decision
Applicant
Show
Agent
John Elvidge Planning Consultancy

How this decision compares

Decided in 574 days from validation, 499 days slower than Thanet's median of 75 for full applications. Approved, as 92% of full applications here are.

29%decided within 8 weeks
92%approved
17%go to committee

Plota live figures for full applications decided by Thanet in the last twelve months, from validation. Thanet decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Committee
22 Apr 2026
Statutory expiry
22 May 2026
Thanet
Planning Authority Score
4.5/10
Below average
#175 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Thanet ranks #171 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (94%) than the national average (90%).

These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Thanet decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
91%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #103 of 296
94%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #122 of 296
62%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #171 of 296
45%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #196 of 296
79%
Minor dwellings approved
105 decided (1-9 homes)
85%
Major dwellings approved
27 decided (10+ homes)
90%
Change of use approved
50 decided
751
Total decisions
67 refused in the year to March 2026