LAND WEST OF TARAS YARD THE REEDS ROAD FRENSHAM FARNHAM Change of use of land from agricultural to mixed use… Data via plota.co.uk

WA/2025/01716 - FULL APPLICATION Approved

Proposal

Change Of Use Of Land From Agricultural To Mixed Use Agriculture And Education And Erection Of A Building For Educational Use With Solar Panels; Erection Of Bin And Cycle Store; Creation Of Car Park And Track With Associated Landscaping; Relocation Of Existing Field Shelter. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
8 Sept 2025
✓
Approved
23 Dec 2025

Approved on 23 Dec 2025 · Last checked 18 Oct 2026

Planning committee

Decided by Waverley Planning Committee on 17 Dec 2025.

Approved unanimously

As officers recommended.

  • Officers advised approval because education and health benefits, biodiversity gain and design benefits outweighed Green Belt and landscape harm.
  • Supporters highlighted the charity’s value to young people, while objectors raised concerns about the Green Belt, traffic, wildlife, noise and drainage.
  • The committee unanimously approved the application subject to 15 conditions and six informatives.
Read how the committee decided The proposal, site history, officers’ assessment, public views, speakers, debate, vote and decision. Includes the meeting recording, from 1:27:12 where this application was taken

Source: Plota analysis of Waverley's committee minutes of 17 Dec 2025.

Site constraints 9

Green belt: London
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.
Read the government guidance ↗
Surrey Hills National Landscape
Great weight to conserving the landscape; major development restricted.
Previously an area of outstanding natural beauty, which is still the designation in law. Since 2023 authorities must seek to further its purpose, not merely have regard to it.
Ancient woodland 6 m away
Inside the 15 m buffer standing advice asks for from the boundary.
National policy refuses development that would cause loss or deterioration of ancient woodland or ancient trees unless there are wholly exceptional reasons.
Agricultural land, grade 3b
Not best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. A site survey can differ.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Other Priority Habitats - NEZ
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
National nature reserve 281 m away: Wealden Heaths
Work nearby can need a habitats assessment.
Harm to a protected site is only accepted where there is no alternative and an overriding public interest.
Also on the record
Nature recovery project: Heathland Connections; SSSI 414 m away: Gong Hill SSSI; Priority habitat 5 m away: Deciduous woodland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No listed building at the site · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 18 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Waverley - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Waverley
Application type
FULL APPLICATION
Received
8 Sept 2025
Validated
8 Sept 2025
Ward
Frensham, Dockenfield and Tilford
Parish
Frensham
Case officer
Show
Target decision
3 Nov 2025
Decision
Granted
Decision date
23 Dec 2025
Applicant
Show

How this decision compares

Decided in 106 days from validation, 42 days slower than Waverley's median of 64 for full applications. Approved, as 79% of full applications here are.

43%decided within 8 weeks
79%approved
280decided in the last year

Plota live figures for full applications decided by Waverley in the last twelve months, from validation. Waverley decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Comments by
16 Dec 2025
Waverley
Planning Authority Score
5.3/10
Average
#133 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Change of use

Waverley ranks #144 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (93%) than the national average (90%).

These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Waverley decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
88%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #163 of 296
93%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #141 of 296
66%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #144 of 296
38%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #134 of 296
70%
Minor dwellings approved
151 decided (1-9 homes)
59%
Major dwellings approved
17 decided (10+ homes)
67%
Change of use approved
21 decided
1,378
Total decisions
161 refused in the year to March 2026