Oakland Gardens Main Road Pentney King's Lynn Norfolk PE32 1FG Data via plota.co.uk

21/02392/DISC_A - Discharge of Planning condition_A Awaiting decision

Proposal

DISCHARGE OF CONDITIONS 5, 14 AND 18 FROM PLANNING PERMISSION - Outline application for new warehousing, a new dwelling house, a wildlife and tourism lake with holiday lodges, nature reserve and associated accesses and facilities, installation of a new sluice gate to assist and ease flooding in Pentney… Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

Received
10 Sept 2026
Validated
11 Sept 2026
Consultation
11 Sept 2026
Decision
Expected by 6 Nov 2026

This application is under consideration - no decision has been issued yet. A decision is expected by 6 Nov 2026. Comments are open until 2 Oct 2026.

Comment on this application ↗

Associated applications 2

  • Part of

    Outlinecouncil archive

    Conditions 5, 14, 18 awaiting decision

    • ConditionsDISCHARGE OF CONDITIONS 5, 14 AND 18 FROM - Outline application for new warehousing, a new…This application21/02392/DISC_A

Site constraints 2

Agricultural land, grade 2
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Predicted from the national soil map. The older provisional map, which most planning maps still show, had this area as grade 3. The predicted grade is Defra's current estimate; only a site survey settles it.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 2
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 12 September 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Kings Lynn - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Kings Lynn
Application type
Discharge of Planning condition_A
Postcode
PE32 1FG
Received
10 Sept 2026
Validated
11 Sept 2026
Ward
Airfield
Parish
Pentney
Case officer
Show
Target decision
6 Nov 2026
Applicant
Show

Public comments

No public comments yet.

Last counted 12 Sept 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-15217490
Consultation
11 Sept 2026
Comments by
2 Oct 2026
Statutory expiry
6 Nov 2026
Env. assessment
No
Kings Lynn
Planning Authority Score
8.4/10
Excellent
#17 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Kings Lynn is one of the fastest councils in England for householder decisions, ranking #20 out of 296. Only 27% of applications have the time limit extended, well below the 41% national average - the council usually decides on time. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (95%) than the national average (90%).

Among the fastest councils in England
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Kings Lynn decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
89%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #133 of 296
95%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #82 of 296
87%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #20 of 296
27%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #41 of 296
76%
Minor dwellings approved
261 decided (1-9 homes)
85%
Major dwellings approved
26 decided (10+ homes)
89%
Change of use approved
44 decided
1,216
Total decisions
131 refused in the year to March 2026