Additional battery storage units at Land at Balderstone Lane, Burnley
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Burnley Development Control Committee on 15 Oct 2026.
What was proposed
The retrospective application sought two additional battery energy storage units and one additional inverter station within the existing complex.
“Proposal: Retrospective Application for 2no. Additional Battery Energy Storage Units and 1no. Additional Inverter Station Drawing Numbers: Technical Note - Phase 2 - 19/06/2026 Coal Mining Technical Note -Amended18/09/2026 Site Layout Plan - CRM3063006-ENZ-XX-XX-DR-T-0002- 19/06/2026 Inverter Elevations -90-270500.04 Rev A -19/06/2026 Widow Hill BESS Container Elevations -19/06/2026 Site Location Plan -CRM3063006-ENZ-XX-XX-DR-T-0001 - 19/06/2026 Widow Hill PJT_Concept~2 –…”
“It is not possible under planning legislation for a s.73 application (VAR/2024/0241) to change the description of an application. As such, the purpose of this application is for the installation of two additional two BESS units with 1no. inverter within the approved development.”
Officer report
The site
The site lies north of Balderstone Lane, slopes southwards, and is within Burnley’s development boundary and a protected employment site.
“The site is an area of land to the north of Balderstone Lane and to the south of a strip of undeveloped land with houses beyond. The site slopes down from north to south.”
“Figure 1: Site Location 1.2 The site is within the development boundary for the settlement of Burnley as defined in the adopted Local Plan and within an existing Protected Employment Site (EMP2/4), Heasandford & Innovation Drive. Furthermore, the site has a specific employment allocation (EMP1/6).”
Officer report
What officers recommended
Officers recommended approval because the units would remain within the existing compound, with established measures addressing fire safety, noise and coal-mining risks.
“It is considered the additional units can be placed without affecting the highway access, vehicular manoeuvrability within the site or effecting visual amenity given the backdrop of the wider BESS site.”
“Measures remain in place through planning conditions attached to VAR/2024/0241 to maintain fire safety and it is considered noise levels would not significantly rise with the introduction of the proposed units. There are no new risks identified by the applicant for the proposal and the Coal Authority agree with the findings.”
Officer report
Consultation responses
The Coal Authority, Environmental Health and highways raised no objection, while safety, fire, drainage and utility comments were provided.
“Environmental Health – No Objection No objection to the proposed development in respect of the potential for noise, nuisance, provided that the noise barrier heights and locations referred to in “Technical Note: Noise Implications of 2no. Additional Battery Containers and 1no. additional Inverter Unit”, dated 17th June 2026, shall be installed as agreed with the Local Planning Authority.”
“Lancashire Fire and Rescue – Comments provided LFRS has commented on previous applications relating to this site, most recently VAR/2024/0241, and it is noted that the details of the current proposal do appear to align with agreed fire safety provisions. On this basis there are no further observations from LFRS, and no additional conditions are requested if permission is granted.”
Officer report
Concerns from residents
Three representations concerned noise, fire risk, mine shafts, lighting, landscaping, construction activity, safety and notification of nearby properties.
“A Site Notice was erected on 3 July 2026 and 48 notification letters have been sent to nearby properties.”
“Development work continues without the relevant permissions in place; • Additional noise created by the proposed units and lead to windows having to remain closed; • Increased fire risk; • Additional weight on the land containing mine shafts, increase risk to health and safety; • No planting has taken place; • Existing trees are not flourishing possible root damage; • Lights being left on during the winter months, pointing to the housing causing difficulty sleeping,…”
Officer report
The committee decision
The application was approved subject to conditions requiring the development to follow the submitted application documents and drawings.
“That the application be approved subject to conditions.”
“The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the application form and the following drawings and documents:”
Minutes
Councillors at the meeting
- Alan HoskerChairReform UKFor(no vote against recorded)
- Martyn HurtGreenFor(no vote against recorded)
- Howard BakerLib DemFor(no vote against recorded)
- Gordon BirtwistleLib DemFor(no vote against recorded)
- Joanne BroughtonConservativeFor(no vote against recorded)
- John HarbourLabourFor(no vote against recorded)
- Shah HussainIndependentFor(no vote against recorded)
- Steve KeoghReform UKFor(no vote against recorded)
- Lubna KhanIndependentFor(no vote against recorded)
- Paul ReynoldsLabourFor(no vote against recorded)
- Chris WeekesReform UKFor(no vote against recorded)
The minutes record this decision with no vote against, so each member present for this item is shown as voting for it.
Apologies Andy Waddington Labour
Source: Plota analysis of the council's minutes; parties from the council's list of councillors.
Sources
- Burnley Development Control Committee minutes, 15 October 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Burnley's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Council
- Burnley
- Date
- Thursday 15 October 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Councillors
- 11Reform UK 3Independent 2Labour 2Lib Dem 2Conservative 1Green 1Show votes
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- View application →
- All decisions
- Burnley committee decisions →
This committee's year
30 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 3 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.