Short-term let accommodation at 406 Webster's Land, Edinburgh

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Edinburgh Development Management Sub-Committee on 10 Jun 2026.

25/04040/FULSTLRefused

What was proposed

The application sought retrospective permission to change a one-bedroom flat from residential use to short-term let accommodation, with no physical changes.

“The application property comprises a one-bedroom first floor flat with an internal floor space of 39 sqm at 406 Webster's Land in the West Port. Webster's Land is a large residential development comprising around 116 individual flats. The property is accessed via a communal gate into Webster's Land with shared main door and communal stairway inside of the building complex. There is no on-site vehicle parking.”

“The application is for the change of use of the property from a flatted dwelling to short term let (sui generis). No internal or external physical changes are proposed. The application form states that the operation of the property as a short term let commenced on 1 December 2019. The application is therefore retrospective.”

Officer report

The site

The flat is in a large residential development within the Old Town Conservation Area and Edinburgh World Heritage Site, with shared access and no parking.

“The property lies within the Old Town Conservation Area and the Old and New Towns of Edinburgh World Heritage Site.”

Officer report

Earlier applications

Earlier applications for this property were refused, while several other flats in Webster’s Land received certificates confirming short-term letting use.

“24/00442/CLESTL 406 Webster's Land Edinburgh EH1 2RX Application for the issue of a Certificate of Lawfulness confirming its existing use and a short term let visitor accommodation. Refused 13 January 2025”

“22/03611/CLE 423 Webster's Land Edinburgh EH1 2RX Existing use of 423 Webster's Land is a residential short-term letting property. Granted 15.09.2022”

Officer report

Officers’ recommendation

Officers recommended refusal because the use would harm neighbouring amenity and the loss of residential accommodation was not justified by economic benefits.

“It is recommended that this application be Refused subject to the details below.”

“The change of use of this property to a short-term let (STL) will have an unacceptable impact on neighbouring amenity. The loss of the residential accommodation has not been justified. Whilst it is recognised that there is an economic benefit to the City as a whole from the provision of tourist accommodation, in this case it does not outweigh the adverse impact on residential amenity or the loss of residential accommodation.”

Officer report

Main planning concerns

The use would bring frequent transient visitors, servicing and security concerns, while the claimed economic benefits did not outweigh losing a home.

“The first-floor flat is accessed from a shared door access and the STL use would enable visitors to arrive and stay at the premises for a short period of time on a regular basis throughout the year in a manner dissimilar to that of permanent residents. It would introduce a frequency of movement to the property and shared access.”

“To comply with the policy, it is not sufficient to demonstrate that the STL use will deliver economic benefits; rather, it must be demonstrated that the economic benefits associated with any individual application are significant enough that they warrant the loss of a home, and the economic and other benefits associated with this.”

Officer report

Consultation and publicity

No consultations were undertaken, and 26 public comments were received following neighbour notification, press publication and site notices.

“Date of Neighbour Notification: 6 August 2025 Date of Renotification of Neighbour Notification: Not Applicable Press Publication Date(s): 15 August 2025 Site Notices Date(s): 12 August 2025 Number of Contributors: 26”

Officer report

What people said

Twenty-three comments supported the application and three objected, with views addressing amenity, safety, residential character, licensing and economic benefits.

“- impact on quality of life - impact on safety & welfare (of those in stair/building;) - impact on amenity and residential character - impact on/imbalance of community mix - impact on World Heritage Site…”

“- no negative impact on residential amenity - proposal complies with licensing requirements. - the proposal will result in an economic benefit which outweighs the loss of residential accommodation. - over provision of short-term holiday lets…”

Officer report

The committee’s decision

The committee refused planning permission for the reasons in the officer report, including harm to local amenity and unjustified loss of residential accommodation.

“25/04040/FULSTL - Report by the Chief Planning Officer To REFUSE planning permission for the reasons set out in section C of the report by the Chief Planning Officer. 5.1 - 34, Cramond Road North, Edinburgh (Land Adjacent to Former)”

Minutes

Sources

  • Edinburgh Development Management Sub-Committee minutes, 10 June 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Edinburgh's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Edinburgh
Date
Wednesday 10 June 2026
Recommendation
Officers recommended refusal
Committee decided
Refused
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)

This committee's year

283 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 5 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →