Ruggen House, Berry Lane, Howbrook, Sheffield, S35 7EJ Data via plota.co.uk

2026/0483 - Householder Approved

Proposal

Erection of a detached timber outdoor kitchen Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
15 Jun 2026
✓
Validated
7 Aug 2026
✓
Approved
2 Oct 2026

Approved on 2 Oct 2026 · Delegated · Last checked 3 Oct 2026

Site constraints 6

Green belt: South and West Yorkshire
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.
Read the government guidance ↗
Agricultural land, grade 4
Poor quality farmland, not best and most versatile. Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s), which most planning maps still show, had this area as grade 3. The predicted grade is Defra's current estimate; only a site survey settles it.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 2
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Scheduled monument about 150 m away: Wayside cross at Howbrook crossroads
Its setting is a consideration for work nearby.
Nationally important archaeology protected by the Secretary of State. Work that affects the monument or its setting is rarely permitted.
Historic England ↗
Also on the record
Coalfield, development low risk area; Priority habitat about 44 m away: Deciduous woodland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3

Checked on 6 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Mining Remediation Authority and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Sales history 2

Last sold for £402,150 in June 2018. Other property, freehold.

More than one property is recorded at this address: HM Land Registry does not always give the flat or unit.

1 June 2018£402,150Recorded as a transfer outside a standard sale
28 September 2006£425,000Detached house, leasehold

Sale prices from HM Land Registry's price paid record, matched to this application by its address.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Barnsley - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Barnsley
Application type
Householder
Postcode
S35 7EJ
Received
15 Jun 2026
Validated
7 Aug 2026
Ward
Penistone East Ward
Parish
Wortley
Case officer
Show
Target decision
2 Oct 2026
Decision
Approve with Conditions
Decision date
2 Oct 2026
Decision level
Delegated
Applicant
Show

How this decision compares

Decided in 56 days from validation, about the council's usual 55 days. Approved, as 95% of extensions here are.

72%decided within 8 weeks
95%approved
223decided in the last year

Plota live figures for extensions decided by Barnsley in the last twelve months, from validation. Barnsley decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Comments by
28 Aug 2026
Env. assessment
No
Barnsley
Planning Authority Score
4.1/10
Below average
#189 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Barnsley is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #252 out of 296. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (94%) than the national average (90%).

Slower than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Barnsley decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
92%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #74 of 296
94%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #98 of 296
45%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #252 of 296
44%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #174 of 296
97%
Minor dwellings approved
76 decided (1-9 homes)
83%
Major dwellings approved
12 decided (10+ homes)
80%
Change of use approved
54 decided
673
Total decisions
53 refused in the year to March 2026

Sale prices: Contains HM Land Registry data © Crown copyright and database right 2026. This data is licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.