Building siting variation at Marches Biogas Limited Biodigester Station, Ludlow
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Shropshire Southern Planning Committee on 26 May 2026.
What was proposed
The application sought to move an approved building about two metres east, amend internal access and remove a three-metre wall.
“The proposal involves a minor revision to the siting of the approved building for feedstock and drying, moving it approximately 2 metres further eastwards from that approved under 25/02622/AMP, together with amended internal access arrangements from Shropshire Council-owned land to the south and the removal of a 3m high wall associated with feedstock tip handling.”
“The applicant advises the revised siting of the building and creation of a southern internal access is required due to unexpected practical and safety constraints identified during the implementation, including difficulties in safely installing wall and roof panels without removing existing infrastructure, and the presence of a main sewer to the east of the approved footprint.”
Officer report
The site
The site is previously developed land within a business park, and the changes remain within the established site boundary.
“The site lies within the Ludlow Business Park at Coder Road and comprises previously developed land with existing operational infrastructure. The revised siting of the building and internal access remains within the developed portion of the site and does not extend development beyond the established site boundary or into undeveloped land.”
Officer report
Officers’ recommendation
Officers recommended approval because the change was modest, justified by site constraints, retained biodiversity gains and would not cause undue harm.
“Implications for the approved Biodiversity Gain Plan 6.2.1 The key distinction between this application and the earlier non-material amendment application is that the Biodiversity Gain Plan has been discharged in the intervening period. Whilst the scale of the proposed changes to block plan are minor, the amended layout interacts with the approved biodiversity enhancement land to the south of the site.”
“The principle of development has already been established by Committee, and the proposed Section 73 variation is required solely to allow the practical delivery of the approved scheme. The amendment is modest in extent, justified by operational constraints on site, continues to provide the required 10% biodiversity net gain, and would not result in any undue harm in respect of trees, highways or neighbour amenity.”
Officer report
Consultation responses
Ecology, drainage and the town council raised no objection to the variation.
“SC Ecology – (02/04/26) No objection. The BNG assessment submitted continues to maintain a net gain on site and there are no ecological implications to the proposed variation.”
“Ludlow Town Council - (25/03/26) No objection.”
Officer report
Members’ view
Members considered the amendments minor and acceptable.
“The Principal Planning Officer introduced the application which was an application for the variation of Condition No. 2 attached to permission 25/00309/FUL dated 27 March 2025 and with reference to the drawings and photographs displayed, he drew Members’ attention to the to the location and layout.”
“Members considered the amendments to be minor and acceptable.”
Minutes
The vote
The committee granted permission in accordance with the officer recommendation, subject to the listed conditions.
“That in accordance with Officer recommendation planning permission be granted subject to the conditions set out in Appendix 1”
Minutes
Conditions
The permission requires compliance with the approved plans, existing management measures, operating hours and the submitted biodiversity plans.
“The development shall be carried out in accordance with the approved wildlife enhancement measures and external lighting plan approved under 25/04324/DIS. Any further changes to the locations of the external lighting shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority.”
“Notwithstanding that previously approved under 25/00006/DIS, the development shall be carried out in full accordance with the Biodiversity Gain Plan and Habitat Management and Monitoring Plan (HMMP) submitted with this application and hereby approved.”
Officer report
Sources
- Shropshire Southern Planning Committee minutes, 26 May 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Shropshire's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Council
- Shropshire
- Date
- Tuesday 26 May 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- View application →
- All decisions
- Shropshire committee decisions →
This committee's year
6 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 1 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.