Brixham Fish Quay The Quay Brixham TQ5 8AW Data via plota.co.uk

Pending P/2026/0517
Council
Date received
12 Aug 2026
Date validated
12 Aug 2026
Postcode
TQ5 8AW

Description

Request for Environmental Impact Assessment Screening Opinion on extension on existing fish quay. THE TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING (ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT) REGULATIONS 2017 DO NOT MAKE PROVISION FOR PUBLIC COMMENTS TO BE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT WHEN DETERMINING REQUESTS FOR SCREENING/SCOPING OPINIONS. Data via plota.co.uk

Last checked

Decision outlook

Plota predicts a decision by 23 Oct 2026, from Torbay's recent commercial premises.

Day 58 of the 56-day target. Torbay usually decides commercial premises by day 63.

Day 585 days to the predicted decision (day 63)
45%decided within 8 weeks
84%approved
41decided in the last year

Plota live figures for commercial premises decided by Torbay in the last twelve months, from validation. Torbay decision record →

Site constraints 6

Brixham Town conservation area
Demolition needs planning permission and permitted development is restricted.
The council must give weight to preserving or enhancing the area's character and appearance. Not every council has published its boundaries as open data.
Council document ↗
Kingswear to Lyme Regis 16 m away
Matters where it crosses or adjoins the site; the route and its margin are protected.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 2
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Radon affected area, class 6
An estimated 30% or more of homes reach the radon action level. Indicative for the 1 km square, which takes the highest class found in it; a radon test gives the answer for a building.
From the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency indicative atlas. Under building regulations, as the BRE guide BR 211 (2023) sets out, new buildings and extensions need basic radon protection from class 3 in England and Wales and from class 2 in Scotland, and full protection from class 5. The class at the site itself, from the detailed BGS map, decides which.
UKHSA radon ↗
11 listed buildings within 150 m
Nearest: Retaining Wall to Path Fronting Custom House Retaining Wall to Path Fronting Kelvin Court Retaining Wall to Path Fronting Nos 11-17 Overgang, Grade II, 34 m away · 11 Grade II
The site itself is not listed. Listed building consent is needed for work that affects the special interest of a listed building, inside or out, on top of planning permission. Setting can be a consideration for buildings nearby; there is no fixed radius.
Show all 11 with distances
Historic England ↗
Also on the record
Inside the Brixham built-up area.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Torbay - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service
Torbay
Planning Authority Score
1.9/10
Poor
#276 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Torbay is one of the slowest councils in England for householder decisions, ranking #276 out of 296. 54% of applications have the time limit extended, above the 41% national average. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (90%) than the national average (90%).

Among the slowest councils in England
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Torbay decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
87%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #183 of 296
90%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #197 of 296
37%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #276 of 296
54%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #247 of 296
81%
Minor dwellings approved
53 decided (1-9 homes)
100%
Major dwellings approved
9 decided (10+ homes)
91%
Change of use approved
44 decided
529
Total decisions
68 refused in the year to March 2026