Land At Burlow Road And Heathfield Nook Road , Burlow Road , Harpur Hill , Buxton , Derbyshire , Data via plota.co.uk

DOC/2026/0029 - Discharge of conditions Consultations/Re-consultations issued
Admin / procedural

Proposal

Discharge of Conditions 10 and 11 in relation to Data via plota.co.uk

Track application Save this application and get an email when its status or decision changes. Alerts nearby Get email alerts for new planning applications near this address.
View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
24 Apr 2026
Decision
Target date was 19 Jun 2026

Under consideration

No decision has been issued yet. A decision is expected by 19 Jun 2026.

The consultation period closed on 20 May 2026.

Documents

View the documents on the council's website ↗

Associated applications 4

Site constraints 4

Nutrient neutrality catchment: Peak District Dales SAC
New homes and overnight accommodation must show nutrient neutrality before approval.
Natural England advice: extra wastewater in these catchments harms protected habitats, so schemes must offset their nutrient load, usually through credits.
Radon affected area, class 6
An estimated 30% or more of homes reach the radon action level. Indicative for the 1 km square, which takes the highest class found in it; a radon test gives the answer for a building.
From the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency indicative atlas. Under building regulations, as the BRE guide BR 211 (2023) sets out, new buildings and extensions need basic radon protection from class 3 in England and Wales and from class 2 in Scotland, and full protection from class 5. The class at the site itself, from the detailed BGS map, decides which.
UKHSA radon ↗
Also on the record
Inside the Harpur Hill built-up area; Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) had this area as grade 5, but it predates the buildings here and the current map does not class it as farmland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in High Peak - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Nearby new applications

20 Sept 2026Pending

20 , Curlew Avenue , Harpur Hill , Buxton , Derbyshire , SK17 9UN

Discharge of Condition 4 in relation to HPK/2026/0171

DOC/2026/0068

Important details

Council
High Peak
Application type
Discharge of conditions
Received
24 Apr 2026
Validated
24 Apr 2026
Case officer
Show
Target decision
19 Jun 2026
Applicant
Show
Agent
Emery Planning

Consultation & key dates

Comments by
20 May 2026
High Peak
Planning Authority Score
1.2/10
Poor
#287 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

High Peak is one of the slowest councils in England for householder decisions, ranking #284 out of 296. The council extends the time limit on 73% of applications - one of the highest rates in England. Expect your application to take longer than the standard deadline. Householder applications are slightly less likely to be approved here (89%) than the national average (90%).

Among the slowest councils in England
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
High Peak decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
85%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #207 of 296
89%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #204 of 296
29%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #284 of 296
73%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #291 of 296
78%
Minor dwellings approved
32 decided (1-9 homes)
80%
Major dwellings approved
5 decided (10+ homes)
89%
Change of use approved
18 decided
364
Total decisions
55 refused in the year to March 2026
Source: MHCLG planning statistics · See full council rankings