Land Adj. To 48 Wickham Way Haywards Heath West Sussex RH16 1UQ Data via plota.co.uk

DM/25/2884 - Full Application Approved

Proposal

Erection of a dwelling house on land adj to 48 Wickham Way including solar panels to the roof Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
10 Nov 2025
✓
Validated
21 Jan 2026
✓
Committee
13 Aug 2026
✓
Approved
14 Aug 2026

Approved on 14 Aug 2026 · Planning Committee · Last checked 16 Aug 2026

Planning committee

Decided by Mid Sussex Planning Committee on 13 Aug 2026.

Approved by 10 votes to 1

As officers recommended.

  • Officers advised approval because the benefits outweighed the limited parking harm and the site was sustainably located.
  • Residents and the town council raised concerns about parking, overdevelopment, trees, drainage, character and construction impacts.
  • The committee approved permission by 10 votes to 1, subject to conditions.
Read how the committee decided The proposal, site history, officer assessment, objections, consultation responses, committee vote and decision. Includes the meeting recording

Source: Plota analysis of Mid Sussex's committee minutes of 13 Aug 2026.

Site constraints 3

Public footpath about 28 m away
Matters where it crosses or adjoins the site: obstructing a path without a diversion order is an offence, and work cannot start until the order is confirmed.
Compiled from highway authority data, not the legal definitive map. A few authorities have not published, so no path shown is not proof there is none.
Also on the record
Conservation area about 85 m away: Mill Hill Close; Inside the Haywards Heath built-up area.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 11 September 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Mid Sussex - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Mid Sussex
Application type
Full Application
Postcode
RH16 1UQ
Received
10 Nov 2025
Validated
21 Jan 2026
Ward
Lindfield
Parish
Haywards Heath
Case officer
Show
Target decision
18 Mar 2026
Decision
Permission
Decision date
14 Aug 2026
Decision level
Planning Committee
Applicant
Show

How this decision compares

Decided in 205 days from validation, 145 days slower than Mid Sussex's median of 60 for new homes. Approved, as 64% of new homes here are.

50%decided within 8 weeks
64%approved
5%go to committee

Plota live figures for new homes decided by Mid Sussex in the last twelve months, from validation. Mid Sussex decision record →

Public comments

20comments received
17 objecting3 neutral

85% object · above the UK average of 75%

23 neighbours consulted · Last counted 16 Aug 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14468767
Committee
13 Aug 2026
Env. assessment
No
Mid Sussex
Planning Authority Score
4.8/10
Below average
#161 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Mid Sussex ranks #150 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (93%) than the national average (90%).

These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Mid Sussex decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
92%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #87 of 296
93%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #132 of 296
64%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #150 of 296
44%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #179 of 296
80%
Minor dwellings approved
83 decided (1-9 homes)
89%
Major dwellings approved
27 decided (10+ homes)
82%
Change of use approved
33 decided
1,115
Total decisions
93 refused in the year to March 2026