Land To The North Of Siskin Meadow Seaham Garden Village SR7 8FJ Data via plota.co.uk

DM/26/02541/FPA - Full Planning Application Pending Consideration

Proposal

Hybrid application for the erection of 53 dwellings (full - including vehicular access, landscaping and associated infrastructure) and outline planning permission with all matters reserved for the erection of up to 157 dwellings, landscaping and associated infrastructure. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
22 Sept 2026
✓
Validated
23 Sept 2026
✓
Consultation
28 Sept 2026
Decision
Expected by 23 Dec 2026

Under consideration

No decision has been issued yet. Plota predicts a decision around 18 Nov 2026, from Durham's recent new homes.

Comments are open until 22 Oct 2026

Comment on this application ↗

Documents 29

Statements & assessments 21

PDF APPENDIX 21 - SOCIO-ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT Supporting Information · 22 Sept 2026 View ↗ PDF APPENDIX 9 - SHADOW HABITATS REGULATION ASSESSMENT Supporting Information · 22 Sept 2026 View ↗ PDF APPENDIX 11 - ARCHAEOLOGICAL DESK-BASED ASSESSMENT Supporting Information · 22 Sept 2026 View ↗ PDF APPENDIX 10 - HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Supporting Information · 22 Sept 2026 View ↗ PDF APPENDIX 17 - PHASE 1 LAND CONTAMINATION ASSESSMENT Supporting Information · 22 Sept 2026 View ↗ PDF APPENDIX 1 - DESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT Supporting Information · 22 Sept 2026 View ↗ PDF APPENDIX 8 - ECOLOGICAL APPRAISAL Supporting Information · 22 Sept 2026 View ↗ PDF APPENDIX 5 - BIODIVERSITY NET GAIN ASSESSMENT Supporting Information · 22 Sept 2026 View ↗ PDF APPENDIX 7 - BIODIVERSITY METRIC DETAILED AREA Supporting Information · 22 Sept 2026 View ↗ PDF APPENDIX 6 - BIODIVERSITY METRIC HYBRID Supporting Information · 22 Sept 2026 View ↗ PDF PLANNING STATEMENT Supporting Information · 22 Sept 2026 View ↗ PDF APPENDIX 13 - TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT Supporting Information · 22 Sept 2026 View ↗ PDF APPENDIX 3 - ARBORICULTURAL ASSESSMENT Supporting Information · 22 Sept 2026 View ↗ PDF APPENDIX 12 - GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY REPORT Supporting Information · 22 Sept 2026 View ↗ PDF APPENDIX 27 - SUSTAINABILITY STATEMENT Supporting Information · 22 Sept 2026 View ↗ PDF APPENDIX 23 - AIR QUALITY ASSESSMENT Supporting Information · 22 Sept 2026 View ↗ PDF APPENDIX 24 - HEALTH IMPACT ASSESSMENT Supporting Information · 22 Sept 2026 View ↗ PDF APPENDIX 20 - SUPPLEMENTARY COAL MINING RISK ASSESSMENT Supporting Information · 22 Sept 2026 View ↗ PDF APPENDIX 22 - NOISE ASSESSMENT Supporting Information · 22 Sept 2026 View ↗ PDF APPENDIX 19 - COAL MINING RISK ASSESSMENT Supporting Information · 22 Sept 2026 View ↗ PDF APPENDIX 16 - FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT & DRAINAGE STRATEGY Supporting Information · 22 Sept 2026 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 5

Agricultural land, grade 2
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s), which most planning maps still show, had this area as grade 3. The predicted grade is Defra's current estimate; only a site survey settles it.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Also on the record
SSSI 208 m away: Stony Cut, Cold Hesledon SSSI; Radon affected area, class 2; National infrastructure project 133 m away: Morven Hawthorn Pit Grid Connection Project, at pre-application; Coalfield, development low risk area.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No listed building at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Mining Remediation Authority, the Planning Inspectorate, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Durham - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Durham
Application type
Full Planning Application
Postcode
SR7 8FJ
Received
22 Sept 2026
Validated
23 Sept 2026
Ward
Murton
Parish
Hawthorn
Case officer
Show
Target decision
23 Dec 2026
Decision level
Committee
Applicant
Show

Decision outlook

Day 16 of the 91-day target. Durham usually decides new homes by day 56.

Day 1675 days to the 91-day target
54%decided within 8 weeks
70%approved
12%go to committee

Plota live figures for new homes decided by Durham in the last twelve months, from validation. Durham decision record →

Public comments

1comment received
1 objecting

297 neighbours consulted · Last counted 4 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-15213397
Planning Portal ref
PP-15213397
Neighbours
25 Sept 2026
Consultation
28 Sept 2026
Comments by
22 Oct 2026
Site or press notice
1 Oct 2026
Statutory expiry
23 Dec 2026
Env. assessment
No
Durham
Planning Authority Score
5.2/10
Average
#137 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Major dwellings

Durham ranks #190 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. 48% of applications have the time limit extended, above the 41% national average. Householder applications are more likely to be approved here than most councils, with a 97% approval rate vs 90% nationally.

More permissive than most councils
97% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Durham decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
93%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #52 of 296
97%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #29 of 296
59%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #190 of 296
48%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #213 of 296
79%
Minor dwellings approved
95 decided (1-9 homes)
90%
Major dwellings approved
49 decided (10+ homes)
87%
Change of use approved
201 decided
1,706
Total decisions
113 refused in the year to March 2026