Martham Water Tower, Somerton Road West Somerton NR29 4DH Data via plota.co.uk

06/26/0462/TEL Approved

Proposal

Notification of proposed installation of telecommunications apparatus: Installation of 1No. Arqiva OMNI antenna on a new support pole fixed to the water tower; Installation of 1No. Arqiva equipment cabinet; Ancillary development including ground cabinets and concrete base. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
10 Jun 2026
✓
Approved
8 Jul 2026

Approved on 8 Jul 2026 · Last checked 5 Sept 2026

Site constraints 4

Nutrient neutrality catchment: Upper Thurne Broads and Marshes
New homes and overnight accommodation must show nutrient neutrality before approval.
Natural England advice: extra wastewater in these catchments harms protected habitats, so schemes must offset their nutrient load, usually through credits.
The Broads National Park
The park authority decides applications here. Great weight to conserving the landscape; major development restricted.
Landscape, scenic beauty and wildlife carry great weight, and major development is only allowed in exceptional circumstances.
Agricultural land, grade 1
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Network Expansion Zone
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Great Yarmouth - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Postcode
NR29 4DH
Received
10 Jun 2026
Validated
10 Jun 2026
Parish
Somerton
Case officer
Show
Target decision
8 Jul 2026
Decision
NO OBJECTION
Decision date
8 Jul 2026
Applicant
Show
Agent
Martin Brown Technology Services Limited Rutland House

How this decision compares

Decided in 28 days from validation, 68 days faster than Great Yarmouth's median of 96 for full applications. Approved, as 100% of full applications here are.

3%decided within 8 weeks
100%approved
160decided in the last year

Plota live figures for full applications decided by Great Yarmouth in the last twelve months, from validation. Great Yarmouth decision record →

Great Yarmouth
Planning Authority Score
4.4/10
Below average
#181 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Great Yarmouth ranks #125 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. 49% of applications have the time limit extended, above the 41% national average. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (92%) than the national average (90%).

These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Great Yarmouth decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
87%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #171 of 296
92%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #154 of 296
69%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #125 of 296
49%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #221 of 296
69%
Minor dwellings approved
51 decided (1-9 homes)
78%
Major dwellings approved
9 decided (10+ homes)
89%
Change of use approved
18 decided
366
Total decisions
47 refused in the year to March 2026