Avocet Tram Road, Rye Harbour, Rye , East Sussex, TN31 7TY Data via plota.co.uk

RR/2025/1983/PNE - Class E to C3 Residential Approved

Proposal

Application to determine if prior approval is required to recombine the ground floor galley and tea room area with the living accommodation to make one dwelling house. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
week of 24 Nov 2025
✓
Validated
27 Nov 2025
✓
Approved
week of 29 Jun 2026

Approved in the week of 29 Jun 2026 · Delegated decision · Last checked 7 Oct 2026

Documents 9

Statements & assessments 1

PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Planning Document Public · 23 Jun 2026 View ↗

Plans & drawings 5

PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Planning Document Public · 23 Jun 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Planning Document Public · 23 Jun 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Planning Document Public · 23 Jun 2026 View ↗
PDF Site Location Plan Site Location Plan · 27 Nov 2025 View ↗ PDF Floor Plan Plans · 27 Nov 2025 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 8

Flood zone 3, rivers and sea
High chance: a 1 in 100 or greater annual chance from rivers, or 1 in 200 from the sea. Any development here needs a flood risk assessment. Defences are not counted.
The Environment Agency flood map for planning. Homes in zone 3 must also pass the sequential test. Surface water flooding is a separate map.
Flood map ↗
Local nature reserve about 106 m away: Dungeness, Romney Marsh and Rye Bay
Work nearby can need a habitats assessment.
Harm to a protected site is only accepted where there is no alternative and an overriding public interest.
Scheduled monument about 87 m away: Martello tower no 28 at Rye Harbour
Its setting is a consideration for work nearby.
Nationally important archaeology protected by the Secretary of State. Work that affects the monument or its setting is rarely permitted.
Historic England ↗
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 1
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
SSSI about 106 m away: Rye Harbour SSSI
Natural England may need consulting, depending on what is proposed.
Sites of special scientific interest are the best wildlife and geological sites in the country. Development likely to harm one is rarely permitted.
Also on the record
2 listed buildings within 150 m of the postcode pin; Inside the Rye built-up area; Heritage at risk about 87 m away: Martello Tower No. 28, Rye Harbour.
Not affected
Not green belt

Checked on 6 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Sales history 2

Last sold for £185,000 in March 2003. Semi-detached house, freehold.

25 March 2003£185,000
14 December 1999£105,000

Sale prices from HM Land Registry's price paid record, matched to this application by its address.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Rother - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Rother
Application type
Class E to C3 Residential
Postcode
TN31 7TY
Received
week of 24 Nov 2025
Validated
27 Nov 2025
Parish
Icklesham
Case officer
Show
Target decision
30 Jun 2026
Decision
Prior Approval not required
Decision date
week of 29 Jun 2026
Decision level
Delegated decision
Applicant
Show

Consultation & key dates

Statutory expiry
30 Jun 2026
Rother
Planning Authority Score
2.5/10
Poor
#252 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Rother is one of the slowest councils in England for householder decisions, ranking #292 out of 296. The council extends the time limit on 71% of applications - one of the highest rates in England. Expect your application to take longer than the standard deadline. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (95%) than the national average (90%).

Among the slowest councils in England
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Rother decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
89%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #141 of 296
95%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #88 of 296
25%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #292 of 296
71%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #287 of 296
72%
Minor dwellings approved
127 decided (1-9 homes)
89%
Major dwellings approved
9 decided (10+ homes)
86%
Change of use approved
36 decided
739
Total decisions
84 refused in the year to March 2026

Sale prices: Contains HM Land Registry data © Crown copyright and database right 2026. This data is licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.