Planning obligation modification at Street Record, Spring Meadows, Great Shefford, Hungerford
Summary of planning committee decision
Deferred by West Berkshire Western Area Planning Committee on 19 Aug 2026.
What was proposed
The application sought to modify a restriction in a 1988 legal agreement covering land associated with Spring Meadows.
“Modification of Planning Obligation on approved application 87/30084/ADD (130084) - the Seventh Schedule section (F) of legal agreement dated 24th May 1988. Street Record, Spring Meadows, Great Shefford [name withheld] 1 Extension of time agreed with applicant until tbc…”
“West Berkshire Council Western Area Planning Committee 19 th August 2026 1. Introduction 1.1 The purpose of this report is for the Committee to consider the proposed development against the policies of the development plan and the relevant material considerations, and to make a decision as to whether to approve or refuse the application.”
Officer report
Planning history
The 1988 permission approved residential development and a football pitch, while a later application for 16 homes remains pending.
“Planning History 2.1 The table below outlines the relevant planning history of the application site. Application Proposal Decision / Date 87/30084/ADD Residential development and football pitch Approved / 26.10.1988 25/01800/FULMAJ Proposed 16no dwellings, new access, public open space and landscaping Pending Consideration 3.”
Officer report
What officers recommended
Officers recommended permission because the football use had ended, agricultural use was accepted, and current policy supported residential development in principle.
“West Berkshire Council Western Area Planning Committee 19 th August 2026 letter dated 9 th September 2008) that a return to agricultural use accorded with the seventh schedule (Section F). The land has therefore not performed its original recreational function for approximately three decades and has not operated as an active football pitch for a considerable period of time.”
“Through that process the Council concluded that residential development on the site is acceptable in principle, subject to compliance with the detailed requirements of Policy RSA23 and other relevant development plan policies. The restriction contained within Schedule 7(F) was intended, amongst other things, to prevent alternative forms of development occurring on the land without the Council's consent.”
Officer report
The planning question
The key question was whether the restriction still served a useful planning purpose, rather than whether future housing was acceptable.
“The following material considerations are relevant to the consideration of this application: • The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) • The Planning Practice Guidance (PPG) • Planning Obligations SPD (2014) 6. Appraisal Legislative and Policy Context 6.1 This application seeks modification of a planning obligation contained within a Section 52 Agreement dated 24 May 1988 associated with planning permission 87/30084/ADD.”
“The assessment is therefore concerned with the present planning purpose and effect of the obligation rather than whether the obligation was justified when originally entered into. The application is not a determination of the acceptability of any future residential development on the land. Original Purpose of the Obligation 6.5 Planning permission 130084 (87/30084/ADD) granted consent for residential development together with the provision of a football pitch.”
Officer report
Consultation responses
The parish council objected, saying the covenant protected the land and reflected residents’ expectations that it would remain agricultural if football ceased.
“West Berkshire Council Western Area Planning Committee 19 th August 2026 3.9 Any interference with property rights is in the public interest and in accordance with the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 regime for controlling the development of land. This recommendation is based on the consideration of the proposal against adopted Development Plan policies, the application of which does not prejudice the Human Rights of the applicant or any third party. 4.”
“The Parish Council considers that altering the covenant now would undermine the original intent of the agreement and weaken the protections it provides. They therefore request that the proposed modification be refused. Public representations 4.2 Representations have been received from 18 contributors, all of which object to the proposal. The full responses may be viewed with the application documents on the Council’s website, using the link at the start of this report.”
Officer report
Committee decision
The committee deferred the application to a future meeting of the Western Area Planning Committee.
“26/00036/MDOPO Street Record, Spring Meadows, Great Shefford This item was deferred to a future meeting of Western Area Planning Committee. (2)”
Minutes
Sources
- West Berkshire Western Area Planning Committee minutes, 19 August 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of West Berkshire's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Council
- West Berkshire
- Date
- Wednesday 19 August 2026
- Committee decided
- Deferred
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- View application →
- All decisions
- West Berkshire committee decisions →
This committee's year
14 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.