Sea Cadets and offices at Booking Hall Port Of Ramsgate
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Thanet Planning Committee on 22 Oct 2026.
What was proposed
The application sought retrospective permission to use the former ferry departure lounge for Sea Cadets and commercial offices, without physical changes.
“PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT This application seeks planning permission for the change of use of the former booking hall within the old ferry terminal building, from a sui generis use as a departure lounge, to a base for the Sea Cadets and commercial office accommodation. There are no proposed internal or external changes/alterations save for the change of use itself. New advertising has been seen on the building, however this is the subject of a separate application process.”
Officer report
Earlier use and current occupation
The ferry terminal had been underused, while the building accommodated port security, police, logistics businesses, other service providers and the Sea Cadets.
“COMMENTS This application is reported to Planning Committee as an application submitted on behalf of Thanet District Council. Principle of Development The application building has not been in its intended use for some time, and the application team provided background information surrounding both the existing use of the building and occupiers (including Port Security, Kent Police, Shipping and Logistics businesses, import and export service providers, and the Sea Cadets).”
Officer report
Why officers recommended approval
Officers found that reusing the building supported the port and community facility without harming its character, neighbouring occupiers, flood risk, biodiversity or highway safety.
“In terms of residential occupiers surrounding the site, these sit above the clifftop and are divorced from the site by the gradient of the cliffs and therefore the works would not be likely to result in harm to residential property occupiers within the surrounding environment given the office based nature of the site, and some community element.”
“The development is appropriately flood resistant and resilient such that, in the event of a flood, it could be quickly brought back into use without significant refurbishment; and e. It can be demonstrated that flood risk will not be increased elsewhere. Policy CC02 of the Thanet Local Plan sets out that new development is required to manage surface water resulting from development using sustainable drainage systems (SuDs) wherever possible.”
Officer report
Consultation and objections
No neighbour representations were received, while consultees raised no objections on heritage, air quality, dust or highway grounds.
“QD06 - Advertisements CC01 - Fluvial and Tidal Flooding CC02 - Surface Water Management CC03 - Coastal Development SE05 - Air Quality SE06 - Noise Pollution SE08 - Light Pollution TP02 - Walking TP03 - Cycling TP06 - Car Parking TP08 - Freight and Service Delivery NOTIFICATIONS Letters were sent to neighbouring property occupiers and a site notice posted close to the site. No representations have been received.”
“The proposed cadet use may reasonably be regarded as a more sensitive receptor than the business receptor considered in the existing assessment. However, applying a precautionary high sensitivity receptor classification to the same low dust impact risk would result in only a slight adverse magnitude of effect under the IAQM assessment methodology. This does not, in itself, indicate a significant adverse air quality or dust impact.”
Officer report
What members agreed
Councillor Moore proposed approval and Councillor Rusiecki seconded the officer recommendation, including the parking condition.
“Councillor Moore proposed and Councillor Rusiecki seconded that the officer recommendation to approve be AGREED, subject to the following conditions:”
“1 The areas shown for the parking of vehicles as approved on plan 05633_MH02 Rev B, received 07/10/26, shall continue to be operational and shall be maintained for that purpose.”
Minutes
The vote
The motion was agreed with 17 votes recorded in favour.
“When put to the vote the motion was AGREED.”
“Voting Result For Against Abstention Cllr Crittenden Cllr Makinson Cllr Boyd Cllr Garner Cllr Matterface Cllr Moore Cllr Packman Cllr Rattigan Cllr Rusiecki Cllr Wing Cllr Wright…”
Minutes
Councillors at the meeting
- Helen CrittendenChairLabour
- Pat MakinsonLabour
- Steve AlbonDeclared an interestLabour
- Martin BoydLabour
- Mike GarnerGreen
- Jennifer MatterfaceLabour
- Paul MooreConservative
- Jack PackmanLabour
- Marc RattiganReform UK
- George RusieckiConservative
- Rebecca WingGreen
- Linda WrightConservative
Apologies Kristian Bright Labour
Source: Plota analysis of the council's minutes; parties from the council's list of councillors.
Sources
- Thanet Planning Committee minutes, 22 October 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Thanet's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Committee
- Thanet Planning Committee
- Council
- Thanet
- Date
- Thursday 22 October 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Councillors
- 12Labour 6Conservative 3Green 2Reform UK 1Show councillors
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- View application →
- All decisions
- Thanet committee decisions →
This committee's year
91 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 2 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.