Charmans Field Marsh Lane Runcton West Sussex PO20 1LG Data via plota.co.uk

26/00319/REM - Approval of Reserved Matters Pending Consideration

Proposal

Reserved Matters application for Access, Appearance, Landscaping, Layout and Scale - up to 94 no. dwellings with public open space, landscaping, sustainable urban drainage, and associated works including footway and cycleway links (pursuant to outline permission - access from Lagness Road). Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
9 Feb 2026
✓
Validated
20 Feb 2026
✓
Consultation
22 Apr 2026
Decision
Expected by 18 Dec 2026

Under consideration

No decision has been issued yet. Plota predicted a decision around 9 Oct 2026; it is now day 231.

A re-consultation started on 22 Apr 2026. The council has not yet published the new comment deadline.

Documents 60

Consultation & comments 29

PDF WSCC FIRE AND RESCUE SERVICE Consultee Comment · 20 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF NORTH MUNDHAM PARISH COUNCIL Parish Comments · 3 Jun 2026 View ↗
PDF Supporter’s name hidden Show Support Comment · 25 May 2026 View ↗
PDF CDC LANDSCAPE OFFICER Consultee Comment · 6 May 2026 View ↗ PDF PUBLIC COMMENT Objection Comment · 22 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF PUBLIC COMMENT Objection Comment · 22 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF CDC HOUSING DELIVERY TEAM Consultee Comment · 21 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF NORTH MUNDHAM PARISH COUNCIL Parish Comments · 15 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF CDC CONSERVATION AND DESIGN Consultee Comment · 31 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF PUBLIC COMMENT Objection Comment · 27 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF WSCC HIGHWAYS Consultee Comment · 26 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF CDC ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION 20/3/26 Consultee Comment · 24 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF NATIONAL HIGHWAYS Consultee Comment · 24 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF NORTH MUNDHAM PARISH COUNCIL Parish Comments · 24 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF PUBLIC OBJECTION Objection Comment · 24 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF PUBLIC COMMENT Objection Comment · 22 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF CDC CONTRACT WASTE SERVICES 20/03/2026 Consultee Comment · 20 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF CDC CONTRACT WASTE SERVICES - WASTE STORAGE AND COLLECTION GUIDANCE 20/03/2026 Consultee Comment · 20 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF CDC ARCHAEOLOGY OFFICER Consultee Comment · 18 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF PUBLIC COMMENT Third Party Other · 16 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF CDC ENVIRONMENTAL STRATEGY Consultee Comment · 12 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF SOUTHERN WATER Consultee Comment · 9 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF NATURAL ENGLAND Consultee Comment · 6 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF PUBLIC COMMENT Objection Comment · 5 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF SOUTHERN WATER Consultee Comment · 5 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF PUBLIC COMMENT Objection Comment · 5 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF PUBLIC COMMENT Objection Comment · 5 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF LOCAL POLICING SERVICE IMPROVEMENT & ENGAGEMENT DEPARTMENT Consultee Comment · 3 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF HBC Consultee Comment · 3 Mar 2026 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Associated applications 2

  • Part of

    OutlineApprovedcouncil archive
    • Reserved mattersReserved Matters application for Access, Appearance, Landscaping, Layout and Scale - up to 94…This application26/00319/REM

Site constraints 5

In flood zones plus climate change
Inside the extent flood zones 2 and 3 could reach with climate change: the Central allowance for the 2080s on rivers, the Upper End allowance for sea level rise to 2125. From the sea. Defences are not counted.
The Environment Agency flood map for planning. Councils use it to decide when a flood risk assessment and the sequential test are needed. It is indicative and does not show whether a particular property will flood.
Flood map ↗
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 1
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
Radon affected area, class 3; Inside the Runcton built-up area; Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) had this area as grade 3, but it predates the buildings here and the current map does not class it as farmland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Chichester - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Chichester
Application type
Approval of Reserved Matters
Postcode
PO20 1LG
Received
9 Feb 2026
Validated
20 Feb 2026
Ward
North Mundham And Tangmere
Parish
North Mundham
Case officer
Show
Target decision
18 Dec 2026
Decision level
Delegated
Applicant
Show
Agent
Fellows Planning Limited

Decision outlook

Day 231, past the statutory target. 92% of commercial and major works in Chichester are decided within thirteen weeks; extensions of time are common, and the council need not decide on the day. Last seen undecided on 1 Oct 2026.

Day 231140 days past the 91-day target
76%decided within 8 weeks
89%approved
54decided in the last year

Plota live figures for commercial and major works decided by Chichester in the last twelve months, from validation. Chichester decision record →

Public comments

No public comments yet.

148 neighbours consulted · Last counted 1 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14677121
Planning Portal ref
PP-14677121
Consultation
22 Apr 2026
Comments by
26 Mar 2026
Statutory expiry
22 May 2026
Env. assessment
No
Chichester
Planning Authority Score
8.9/10
Excellent
#6 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Major dwellings

Chichester is one of the fastest councils in England for householder decisions, ranking #10 out of 296. Only 18% of applications have the time limit extended, well below the 41% national average - the council usually decides on time. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (95%) than the national average (90%).

Among the fastest councils in England
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Chichester decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
89%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #127 of 296
95%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #72 of 296
93%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #10 of 296
18%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #15 of 296
68%
Minor dwellings approved
110 decided (1-9 homes)
76%
Major dwellings approved
17 decided (10+ homes)
74%
Change of use approved
34 decided
935
Total decisions
107 refused in the year to March 2026