Land Rear Of 87 To 91 Mackenders Lane Eccles Aylesford Kent Data via plota.co.uk

26/00933/RD - Reserved Details Approved

Proposal

Details of condition 19 (part A) (Archaeology) pursuant to planning permission Demolition of existing poly tunnel and outbuildings and construction of 3 No. detached dwellings Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
15 May 2026
✓
Consultation
8 Jun 2026
✓
Approved
7 Jul 2026

Approved on 7 Jul 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 6 Sept 2026

Associated applications 2

  • Part of

    FullApprovedcouncil archive

    Conditions 19 discharged

    • ConditionsDetails of condition 19 (part A) (Archaeology) Demolition of existing poly tunnel…This application26/00933/RD

Site constraints 3

Agricultural land, grade 3a
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s), which most planning maps still show, had this area as grade 2. The predicted grade is Defra's current estimate; only a site survey settles it.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 2
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
Radon affected area, class 4.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No listed building at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Tonbridge - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Tonbridge
Application type
Reserved Details
Postcode
ME20 7JA
Received
15 May 2026
Validated
15 May 2026
Ward
Aylesford North And North Downs
Parish
Aylesford
Case officer
Show
Target decision
10 Jul 2026
Decision
Approved
Decision date
7 Jul 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Agent
Andrew Wells Planning & Design

Public comments

No public comments yet.

Last counted 6 Sept 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14932329
Planning Portal ref
PP-14932329
Consultation
8 Jun 2026
Comments by
29 Jun 2026
Statutory expiry
10 Jul 2026
Env. assessment
No
Tonbridge
Planning Authority Score
4/10
Below average
#193 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Major dwellings

Tonbridge is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #244 out of 296. 54% of applications have the time limit extended, above the 41% national average. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (97%) than the national average (90%).

Slower than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Tonbridge decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
95%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #31 of 296
97%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #45 of 296
49%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #244 of 296
54%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #246 of 296
88%
Minor dwellings approved
96 decided (1-9 homes)
82%
Major dwellings approved
11 decided (10+ homes)
89%
Change of use approved
9 decided
880
Total decisions
47 refused in the year to March 2026