Community bicycle storage container at Tarmac opposite Old Bowling Hut Queens Park, Blackburn

“As detailed above, the proposed development involves the siting of a shipping container for the storage of community bicycles. A green shipping container is proposed that would have a length of 3.1m, a width of 2.4m and a height of 2.6m. The proposed container would be used to store community bicycles that would be used as part of initiatives ran by the Council to encourage exercise, inclusivity and wellbeing.”

“The application site forms part of a Grade II listed public park, which is allocated Open Space and is located within the settlement of Blackburn. All of the park is within the ownership of the Council. Dwellings and open land surround the park to all 4 sides. The area of parkland earmarked for the container is currently covered in hardstanding/exposed earth.”

“In that regard, the BwD Heritage Advisor has identified that the proposals would result in less than substantial harm to the significance of the listed park. However, they also note that the park serves as an important recreational space for the local community, and the provision of cycle storage would be required to facilitate beneficial community-led initiatives.”

“A condition is recommended to ensure the works are implemented in accordance with the submitted details in order to clarify the terms of this consent. A further condition is recommended to ensure a green container is installed in order to minimise the visual impacts of the development.”

“BwD Heritage Advisor – For the reasons identified above, the proposal, currently outlined in the submission documents, represents a low level of less than substantial harm. P213 of the NPPF requires clear and convincing justification to be given for any harm. P215 of the NPPF allows LPAs to consider the less than substantial harm against the public benefits generated by a proposal, including where appropriate securing an optimum viable use.”

“If the LPA consider an appropriate balance can be achieved, then the proposal would meet the requirements of Chapter 16 of the NPPF. Should the LPA be minded to approve the application, I would recommend consideration of a condition that secures its removal when no longer required.”

“The proposed development has been publicised through the displaying of a site notice was displayed on 08/01/2026. A press notice was also posted on the same date. No public comments have been received for the application so far. Should any comments be received ahead of the committee meeting, they will be presented as part of the committee update report.”

“That the application be approved subject to the conditions highlighted in the Directors report.”