Land Adjoining White Cottage Ismays Road Ivy Hatch Sevenoaks Kent Data via plota.co.uk

25/02056/FL - Planning Permission Approved

Proposal

Demolition of existing barn, and the construction of two detached dwelling houses Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
9 Dec 2025
✓
Validated
23 Dec 2025
✓
Consultation
19 Mar 2026
✓
Approved
20 Apr 2026

Approved on 20 Apr 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 4 Oct 2026

Documents 38

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 9

Green belt: London
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.
Read the government guidance ↗
Kent Downs National Landscape
Great weight to conserving the landscape; major development restricted.
Previously an area of outstanding natural beauty, which is still the designation in law. Since 2023 authorities must seek to further its purpose, not merely have regard to it.
Habitat network: Other Priority Habitats - NEZ
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
3 listed buildings within 150 m; Radon affected area, class 2; Conservation area 53 m away: Ivy Hatch; Inside the Ightham built-up area; Priority habitat 17 m away: Deciduous woodland; Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) had this area as grade 2, but it predates the buildings here and the current map does not class it as farmland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Tonbridge - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Tonbridge
Application type
Planning Permission
Received
9 Dec 2025
Validated
23 Dec 2025
Ward
Pilgrims With Ightham
Parish
Ightham
Case officer
Show
Target decision
21 Apr 2026
Decision
Approved
Decision date
20 Apr 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show
Agent
Offset Architects

How this decision compares

Decided in 118 days from validation, 53 days slower than Tonbridge's median of 65 for full applications. Approved, as 95% of full applications here are.

39%decided within 8 weeks
95%approved
383decided in the last year

Plota live figures for full applications decided by Tonbridge in the last twelve months, from validation. Tonbridge decision record →

Public comments

2comments received
1 objecting1 supporting

3 neighbours consulted · Last counted 4 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14527133
Planning Portal ref
PP-14527133
Neighbours
29 Dec 2025
Consultation
19 Mar 2026
Comments by
2 Apr 2026
Site or press notice
19 Jan 2026
Statutory expiry
17 Feb 2026
Env. assessment
No
Tonbridge
Planning Authority Score
4/10
Below average
#193 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Tonbridge is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #244 out of 296. 54% of applications have the time limit extended, above the 41% national average. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (97%) than the national average (90%).

Slower than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Tonbridge decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
95%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #31 of 296
97%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #45 of 296
49%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #244 of 296
54%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #246 of 296
88%
Minor dwellings approved
96 decided (1-9 homes)
82%
Major dwellings approved
11 decided (10+ homes)
89%
Change of use approved
9 decided
880
Total decisions
47 refused in the year to March 2026