Three dwellings and access at Barn At Hall Farm Barns, Little Witchingham

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by South Norfolk Broadland Broadland Planning Committee on 9 Sept 2026.

2026/1112Approved

What was proposed

The application sought outline permission to demolish two agricultural buildings and build three dwellings with access, with other matters reserved.

“Applicant’s Name: Ashlar Developments Ltd Site Address Barn at Hall Farm Barns Reepham Road Little Witchingham Norfolk Proposal Outline permission for the erection of 3no dwellings and access with all other matters reserved…”

“The application seeks outline planning permission for the demolition of two existing agricultural buildings and the erection of three dwellings with associated access, and the change of use of agricultural land to residential curtilage…”

Officer report

The site

The site is at Hall Farm, outside a defined settlement, with agricultural buildings, hardstanding, grassland, a mature lime tree and an established driveway.

“The application site lies at Hall Farm, Little Witchingham, approximately 3 kilometres south-east of Reepham and outside any defined settlement limit. The site comprises a rectangular parcel of land located immediately north of the residential development known as Hall Farm Barns and to the north-east of Little Witchingham Hall, a Grade II listed building.”

“Vehicular access is obtained via an established tree-lined driveway leading westwards to Reepham Road. This access currently serves the existing agricultural buildings together with Hall Farm Barns and Little Witchingham Hall.”

Officer report

Earlier permissions

Earlier applications included an approved prior approval for converting one agricultural building to a dwelling, a refused conversion application and an approved five-dwelling scheme nearby.

“20221015 Notification for prior approval for proposed change of use and associated building works of an agricultural building to a single dwelling…”

Officer report

What officers recommended

Officers recommended approval because the proposal offered a better planning outcome than the realistic fallback, subject to nutrient mitigation, obligations and conditions.

“In assessing the proposal against this fallback position, the proposed redevelopment would deliver a materially better planning outcome. Unlike the fallback, which would result in the piecemeal conversion of the two agricultural buildings, the application provides the opportunity for a more comprehensive and coordinated redevelopment of the site.”

“Having regard to the fallback position, the housing benefits of the proposal and the absence of any unacceptable adverse impacts identified through the detailed assessment, taken as a whole, the proposal represents a superior planning outcome when compared with the realistic fallback position, and therefore should be approved.”

Officer report

The committee decision

Members voted 7-1 to approve the application with conditions covering reserved matters, access, drainage, ecology, trees, landscaping and water efficiency.

“Members voted 7-1 for approval with conditions:”

“Time limit for submission of Reserved matters 2. Approval of Reserved matters (scale, layout, appearance, access and landscaping) 3. Time limit for commencement following reserved matters approval 4. Visibility splays 5. Parking and turning areas 6. Foul water drainage scheme 7. Surface water drainage scheme 8. Contamination 9. Unknown contamination 10. Source of illumination 11. Construction impacts 12. Air source heat pump / external plant details 13.”

Minutes

Councillors at the meeting

Apologies Caroline Karimi-Ghovanlou Lib Dem, Paul Auber Lib Dem, Peter Berry Conservative, Stuart Clancy Conservative, Adrian Tipple Labour

Also attending Peter Bulman Conservative

Source: Plota analysis of the council's minutes; parties from the council's list of councillors.

Sources

  • South Norfolk Broadland Broadland Planning Committee minutes, 9 September 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of South Norfolk Broadland's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Date
Wednesday 9 September 2026
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Councillors
8Conservative 5Green 1Labour 1Lib Dem 1Show councillors
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)

This committee's year

31 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 4 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →