Barn At Hall Farm Barns Reepham Road Little Witchingham Norfolk Data via plota.co.uk

2026/1112 - Outline Approved at committee

Approved at planning committee on 9 September 2026. The council has not issued its decision notice yet.

Proposal

Outline permission for the erection of 3no dwellings and access with all other matters reserved Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
20 Apr 2026
✓
Consultation
1 Sept 2026
✓
Committee
9 Sept 2026
Decision notice
Not issued yet

Under consideration

No decision has been issued yet. Plota predicted a decision soon after comments close on 22 Sept 2026; it is now day 200.

The consultation period closed on 22 Sept 2026.

Planning committee

Decided by South Norfolk Broadland Broadland Planning Committee on 9 Sept 2026. The council has not yet issued its decision notice.

Approved

As officers recommended.

  • Officers advised approval because the scheme was a better outcome than the realistic fallback and had no unacceptable identified impacts, subject to mitigation.
  • Residents and local representatives raised concerns about overdevelopment, heritage, trees, wildlife, access, highway safety, water, drainage and neighbour amenity.
  • The committee voted 7-1 for approval with conditions.
Read how the committee decided The proposed development, site history, officers’ assessment, objections and committee decision.

Source: Plota analysis of South Norfolk Broadland's committee minutes of 9 Sept 2026.

Documents 26

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 3

Nutrient neutrality catchment: River Wensum SAC
New homes and overnight accommodation must show nutrient neutrality before approval.
Natural England advice: extra wastewater in these catchments harms protected habitats, so schemes must offset their nutrient load, usually through credits.
Agricultural land, grade 3a
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s), which most planning maps still show, had this area as grade 2. The predicted grade is Defra's current estimate; only a site survey settles it.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
National infrastructure project about 217 m away: Hornsea Project Three Offshore Wind Farm
The site is about 217 m from the project boundary. Generating station, decided. The project page says whether consent was granted. Also within 2 km: Sheringham and Dudgeon Extension Projects (decided, about 1324 m).
Nationally significant infrastructure projects (power stations, electricity lines, pipelines, major roads and railways, harbours, airports and reservoirs) are consented by a Secretary of State under the Planning Act 2008, after an examination by the Planning Inspectorate, rather than by the council. The boundary is the one the Inspectorate consults on and can change as the scheme does. Projects are shown within 2 km of the site.
Planning Inspectorate project page ↗
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 2 November 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Planning Inspectorate and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in South Norfolk Broadland - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Outline
Received
20 Apr 2026
Validated
20 Apr 2026
Ward
Great Witchingham
Parish
Lt Witchingham
Case officer
Show
Target decision
4 Dec 2026
Applicant
Show
Agent
Brown & Co

Decision outlook

Day 200, past the statutory target. 46% of new homes in South Norfolk Broadland are decided within thirteen weeks; extensions of time are common, and the council need not decide on the day. Last seen undecided on 4 Nov 2026.

Day 200144 days past the 56-day target
21%decided within 8 weeks
67%approved
110decided in the last year

Plota live figures for new homes decided by South Norfolk Broadland in the last twelve months, from validation. South Norfolk Broadland decision record →

Public comments

4comments received
3 objecting1 neutral

75% object · above the UK average of 74%

10 neighbours consulted · Last counted 4 Nov 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14833287
Planning Portal ref
PP-14833287
Neighbours
1 Sept 2026
Consultation
1 Sept 2026
Comments by
22 Sept 2026
Site or press notice
21 May 2026
Committee
9 Sept 2026
Statutory expiry
15 Jun 2026
Env. assessment
No
South Norfolk Broadland
Planning Authority Score
5.9/10
Average
#106 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Major dwellings

South Norfolk Broadland ranks #136 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (95%) than the national average (90%).

These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
South Norfolk Broadland decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
93%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #50 of 296
95%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #71 of 296
67%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #136 of 296
42%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #161 of 296
82%
Minor dwellings approved
137 decided (1-9 homes)
92%
Major dwellings approved
12 decided (10+ homes)
100%
Change of use approved
33 decided
1,013
Total decisions
67 refused in the year to March 2026