Small infill extension at Crossways, Fairlight, Hastings

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Rother Planning Committee on 11 Dec 2025.

RR/2025/1481/PApproved

What was proposed

The proposal was a small infill extension at the front of the property, beside lawned garden and a permeable parking area.

“RR/2025/1481/P 7.4.2 This site is not within 50m of the cliff face. The proposal is for a small infill extension at the front of the property where there is an area of lawned garden with Lleylandii trees around the boundary. To the northern corner of the plot to the front of the garage is a permeable shingled area for parking.”

Officer report

Environmental effects

Officers considered the extension unlikely to significantly increase surface-water runoff or affect great crested newts and their habitat.

“Due to the size of the proposed extension it is considered that in the context of the size of the dwelling, plot and permeable space there is no cause for concern as the development is unlikely to have any significant increase to the surface water run-off as there would be limited increase in impermeable area which would be surrounded by existing garden land and a permeable parking area.”

“Great Crested Newts (GCN): The site is identified as being within a White impact zone for GCNs. This zone is an area of low habitat suitability and low probability of GCN presence. It is therefore considered that the proposal is unlikely to impact GCNs and/or their habitat. However, should GCN be found at any stage of the development works, then all works should cease, and Natural England should be contacted directly for advice.”

Officer report

Officers’ recommendation

Officers concluded that the proposal complied with development plan policies and recommended granting full planning permission.

“National guidance states that plans and decisions should apply a presumption in favour of sustainable development. This means approving development proposals that accord with an up-to-date Development Plan without delay or where there are no relevant development plan policies, or the policies which are most important for determining the application are out-of-date, granting permission unless the National Planning Policy Framework provides a clear reason for refusing the…”

“In this instance, taking account of the above, the proposal complies with Development Plan policies, and therefore planning permission should be granted.”

Officer report

Committee consideration

The committee supported the officer recommendation, and a motion to grant permission subject to conditions was proposed and seconded.

“The Planning Committee was supportive of the officer’s recommendation, subject to conditions as outlined below.”

“Councillor Mrs Barnes moved the motion to GRANT (Full Planning Permission) subject to conditions and this was seconded by Councillor Stanger.”

Minutes

The vote

The motion was carried unanimously, with seven votes in favour.

“The motion was declared CARRIED (7 for / unanimous).”

Minutes

The decision

The committee granted full planning permission subject to conditions.

“DECISION: GRANT (FULL PLANNING PERMISSION)”

Minutes

Planning conditions

Conditions required the development to start within three years, follow approved plans and use the described external materials.

“The development hereby permitted shall be begun before the expiration of three years from the date of this permission.”

“The materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the development hereby permitted shall be as described within the application, unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority. Reason: In the interest of visual amenity and in accordance with Policy OSS4 (iii) of the Rother Local Plan Core Strategy and Policy DHG9(ii) of the Rother Development and Site Allocations Plan.”

Minutes

Sources

  • Rother Planning Committee minutes, 11 December 2025
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Rother's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Rother
Date
Thursday 11 December 2025
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Vote
Unanimous
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)

This committee's year

20 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 2 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →