The Dell Long Lane Heronsgate Rickmansworth Hertfordshire WD3 5DJ Data via plota.co.uk

26/0039/FUL - Full Application Refused

Proposal

Erection of two self-build detached dwellings, alterations to existing vehicular access and land levels and proposed associated landscaping. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
13 Jan 2026
✓
Validated
19 Jan 2026
✓
Consultation
22 Jan 2026
✓
Committee
18 Jun 2026
✗
Refused
18 Jun 2026
Appeal
Not lodged

Refused on 18 Jun 2026 · Committee Decision · Last checked 25 Jul 2026

Planning committee

Decided by Three Rivers Planning Committee on 18 Jun 2026.

Refused by 5 votes to 0

Against officer advice: officers had recommended approval.

  • Officers advised approval because the revised scheme would not substantially harm Green Belt openness, and its benefits outweighed its sustainability harm.
  • Objectors raised heritage, rural character, sustainability, highway, activity and limited affordable housing benefits; the agent supported the proposal’s design and benefits.
  • Members voted 5–0 with 3 abstentions to refuse the application for heritage, character, sustainability and affordable housing agreement reasons.
Read how the committee decided The proposal, site history, officer advice, objections, speakers, committee debate, vote and reasons for refusal.

Source: Plota analysis of Three Rivers's committee minutes of 18 Jun 2026.

Documents 97

Plans & drawings 21

PDF CGLA LANDSCAPING PLANS & 3D RENDERS Drawing · 13 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF 2407-PL-L&B LOCATION PLAN & BLOCK PLAN Drawing · 13 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF 2407-PL-EXT SITE EXISTING SITE PLAN & STREET SCENE Drawing · 13 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF 2407-PROP SITE PROPOSED BLOCK PLAN Drawing · 13 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF 2407-PL-105 PROPOSED STREET SCENE & SECTIONED ELEVATIONS Drawing · 13 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF 2407-PL-106 PROPOSED ELEVATIONS & SECTION Drawing · 13 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF 2407-PL-107 PROPOSED ELEVATION LAYOUTS & SECTIONS Drawing · 13 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF 2407-PL-102A PROPOSED GROUND FLOOR PLAN Drawing · 13 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF 2407-PL-102B PROPOSED GROUND FLOOR PLAN Drawing · 13 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF 2407-PL-SITE-G PROPOSED GROUND SITE PLAN Drawing · 13 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF 2407-PL-SITE SG PROPOSED SUB-GROUND SITE PLAN Drawing · 13 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF 2407-PL-101A PROPOSED SUB-GROUND FLOOR PLAN Drawing · 13 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF 2407-PL-101B SUB-GROUND FLOOR PLAN Drawing · 13 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF 2407-PL-ROOF PROPOSED ROOF PLANS Drawing · 13 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF 2407-PL-103 PROPOSED ROOF PLAN Drawing · 13 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF 2407-PL-103A PROPOSED ROOF PLAN Drawing · 13 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF 2407-PL-104 EXISTING & PROPOSED SECTION A-A Drawing · 13 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF 003 REV 01 ILLUSTRATIVE PLAN WITH TREES Drawing · 13 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF 004 REV 01 ILLUSTRATIVE CONCEPT PLAN W/O TREES Drawing · 13 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF 005 REV 01 PLANTING PLAN Drawing · 13 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF 2047-CIL PROPOSED BLOCK PLAN Drawing · 13 Jan 2026 View ↗

Application forms 2

Consultation & comments 59

PDF COMMITTEE LETTER SENT FOR PA Consultation Documents · 10 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF COMMENT FROM CONSERVATION OFFICER Consultee Comment · 16 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Objection Comment · 11 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Objection Comment · 11 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Objection Comment · 11 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Objection Comment · 11 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Objection Comment · 11 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Objection Comment · 11 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Objection Comment · 11 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Objection Comment · 11 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Objection Comment · 11 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Objection Comment · 11 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Objection Comment · 11 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Objection Comment · 11 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Objection Comment · 11 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Objection Comment · 11 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Objection Comment · 10 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show General Comment · 10 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Objection Comment · 9 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Objection Comment · 9 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Objection Comment · 8 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Objection Comment · 8 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Objection Comment · 8 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Objection Comment · 8 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Objection Comment · 8 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Objection Comment · 8 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Objection Comment · 8 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Supporter’s name hidden Show Support Comment · 8 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Objection Comment · 8 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Objection Comment · 8 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Objection Comment · 8 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Supporter’s name hidden Show Support Comment · 8 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Objection Comment · 8 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Supporter’s name hidden Show Support Comment · 7 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Objection Comment · 7 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Supporter’s name hidden Show Support Comment · 7 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Objection Comment · 7 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Objection Comment · 6 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Objection Comment · 5 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Objection Comment · 5 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Objection Comment · 5 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Objection Comment · 5 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Objection Comment · 5 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Objection Comment · 5 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Objection Comment · 5 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Objection Comment · 4 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Objection Comment · 4 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Objection Comment · 4 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Objection Comment · 4 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Objection Comment · 3 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Objection Comment · 3 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Objection Comment · 3 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Objection Comment · 3 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Objection Comment · 3 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Objection Comment · 3 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF COMMENT FROM HERTFORDSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL HIGHWAYS Consultee Comment · 27 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF COMMENT FROM THAMES WATER Consultee Comment · 22 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF LIST OF NEIGHBOURS FOR PA Neighbour Notification List · 21 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF NEIGHBOUR LETTER SENT FOR PA Consultation Documents · 21 Jan 2026 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 4

Green belt: London
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm.
Priority habitat: Deciduous woodland
A habitat of principal importance. It shapes the ecology work and the biodiversity net gain a scheme has to show.
Agricultural land, grade 3a
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Conservation area about 11 m away: Heronsgate
The edge of the area; work outside it can still affect its setting.
The council must give weight to preserving or enhancing the area's character and appearance. Not every council has published its boundaries as open data.
Council document ↗
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 26 September 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Sales history 1

Last sold for £250,000 in October 2023. Other property, freehold.

12 October 2023£250,000Recorded as a transfer outside a standard sale

Sale prices from HM Land Registry's price paid record, matched to this application by its address.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Three Rivers - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Full Application
Postcode
WD3 5DJ
Received
13 Jan 2026
Validated
19 Jan 2026
Ward
Chorleywood South And Maple Cross
Parish
Non-Parished
Case officer
Show
Target decision
16 Mar 2026
Decision
refused
Decision date
18 Jun 2026
Decision level
Committee Decision
Applicant
Show

How this decision compares

Decided in 150 days from validation, 94 days slower than Three Rivers's median of 56 for new homes. Refused, as 30% of new homes here are.

67%decided within 8 weeks
70%approved
10%go to committee

Plota live figures for new homes decided by Three Rivers in the last twelve months, from validation. Three Rivers decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14534778
Comments by
11 Feb 2026
Site or press notice
22 Jan 2026
Committee
18 Jun 2026
Env. assessment
No
Three Rivers
Planning Authority Score
7.3/10
Good
#54 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Three Rivers is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #30 out of 296. Only 24% of applications have the time limit extended, well below the 41% national average - the council usually decides on time. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (91%) than the national average (90%).

Faster than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Three Rivers decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
89%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #145 of 296
91%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #184 of 296
82%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #30 of 296
24%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #28 of 296
85%
Minor dwellings approved
62 decided (1-9 homes)
63%
Major dwellings approved
8 decided (10+ homes)
94%
Change of use approved
17 decided
819
Total decisions
86 refused in the year to March 2026

Sale prices: Contains HM Land Registry data © Crown copyright and database right 2026. This data is licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.