34, Hickeys Almshouses, Sheen Road, Richmond, TW9 1XB Data via plota.co.uk

PA26/2189 - Full Application Approved

Proposal

Temporary change of use from Class C3 Dwellinghouse to Class E Commercial for a period of approximately 12 weeks whilst the Charity's existing office at 95 Sheen Road is refurbished and reconfigured. Temporary office accommodation is required for the 5 staff currently based at 95 Sheen Rd whilst these works are completed. We are a charity providing housing for people over 65 years of age living in the borough. Our current office at 95 provides easy access to all our housing estates, and so we would like to relocate to 34 Hickeys on a temporary basis as this location also enables easy access to our other sites and would require no alterations for use as an office on this very temporary basis. On completion of the works at 95 Sheen Rd, number 34 will revert to being an almshouse providing affordable accommodation for those in need. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
26 Jun 2026
✓
Validated
6 Jul 2026
✓
Consultation
10 Jul 2026
✓
Approved
3 Aug 2026

Approved on 3 Aug 2026 · Delegated Decision Team Leader · Last checked 6 Aug 2026

Site constraints 13

Richmond CA - CA31 Sheen Road RichmondRichm Takeaway Mgmt - Take Away Restriction Zones’ 400 metre buffers around prArticle 4 directionRichm Village Boundary Richmond and Richmond Hill VillageRichm Thruflow CatchmenRichm Susceptibe Ground Water Flood >= 75%Richmond CIL HigherRichm Proposed For Tree Planting 24/1/97
Grade II listed: Hickey's Almshouses
List entry 1252832 · 27 m away · 2 more listed buildings within 150 m (1 Grade II*, 1 Grade II)
Listed building consent is needed for work that affects the special interest of a listed building, inside or out, on top of planning permission. Setting can be a consideration for buildings nearby; there is no fixed radius.
Show the other 2 with distances
Historic England ↗
Sheen Road conservation area
Demolition needs planning permission and permitted development is restricted.
The council must give weight to preserving or enhancing the area's character and appearance. Not every council has published its boundaries as open data.
Council document ↗
Air quality management area: Richmond AQMA
The council has declared the area as failing an air quality objective.
Schemes that add traffic, parking or combustion plant are assessed against the area's action plan and may need an air quality assessment.
Council record ↗
Richmond CA - CA31 Sheen Road RichmondCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Richm Takeaway Mgmt - Take Away Restriction Zones’ 400 metre buffers around prCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Article 4 directionCouncil record
Some permitted development rights are withdrawn. The direction is on the council's register but not published as open data.
Council site ↗
Richm Village Boundary Richmond and Richmond Hill VillageCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Richm Thruflow CatchmenCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Richm Susceptibe Ground Water Flood >= 75%Council record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Richmond CIL HigherCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Richm Proposed For Tree Planting 24/1/97Council record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Also on the record
Inside the Richmond upon Thames built-up area; Public transport access: PTAL 4 (good), TfL 2023, for the 100 m square.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 2 November 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, Transport for London (public transport access levels, Powered by TfL Open Data, OGL v3.0, contains OS data © Crown copyright and database right 2025) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Richmond upon Thames - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Full Application
Postcode
TW9 1XB
Received
26 Jun 2026
Validated
6 Jul 2026
Ward
North Richmond Ward [NRR]
Case officer
Show
Target decision
21 Aug 2026
Decision
Granted Permission
Decision date
3 Aug 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision Team Leader
Applicant
Show

How this decision compares

Decided in 28 days from validation, 23 days faster than Richmond upon Thames's median of 51 for changes of use. Approved, as 66% of changes of use here are.

71%decided within 8 weeks
66%approved
63decided in the last year

Plota live figures for changes of use decided by Richmond upon Thames in the last twelve months, from validation. Richmond upon Thames decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-15029114
Comments by
31 Jul 2026
Site or press notice
10 Jul 2026
Statutory expiry
27 Jul 2026
Richmond upon Thames
Planning Authority Score
4.4/10
Below average
#182 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Change of use

Richmond upon Thames ranks #130 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Richmond upon Thames is also one of the strictest councils - it refuses more householder applications than almost any other, with only 82% approved vs 90% nationally.

One of the strictest councils
only 82% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Richmond upon Thames decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
81%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #257 of 296
82%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #268 of 296
69%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #130 of 296
35%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #104 of 296
68%
Minor dwellings approved
181 decided (1-9 homes)
100%
Major dwellings approved
3 decided (10+ homes)
47%
Change of use approved
17 decided
1,888
Total decisions
358 refused in the year to March 2026