Former Chambers Bus Depot Church Square Bures St Mary Bures Suffolk Data via plota.co.uk

DC/26/03988 - Discharge of Condition(s) Awaiting decision

Proposal

Discharge of Conditions Application for - Conditions 5 (Sustainability Statement), 6 (Louvre Screen), 7 (Zinc Cladding), 8 (Bricks), 9 (Roof Tiles), 10 (Cladding) and 28 (Cycle Storage and EV Charging) Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
14 Sept 2026
✓
Validated
15 Sept 2026
✓
Consultation
15 Sept 2026
Decision
Expected by 10 Nov 2026

Under consideration

No decision has been issued yet. A decision is expected by 10 Nov 2026.

The consultation period closed on 6 Oct 2026.

Associated applications 6

Site constraints 5

Grade II listed: War Memorial
List entry 1389598 · 24 m away · 21 more listed buildings within 150 m (1 Grade I, 2 Grade II*, 18 Grade II)
Listed building consent is needed for work that affects the special interest of a listed building, inside or out, on top of planning permission. Setting can be a consideration for buildings nearby; there is no fixed radius.
Show the other 21 with distances
Historic England ↗
Bures St Mary conservation area
Demolition needs planning permission and permitted development is restricted.
The council must give weight to preserving or enhancing the area's character and appearance. Not every council has published its boundaries as open data.
Council document ↗
In flood zones plus climate change
Inside the extent flood zones 2 and 3 could reach with climate change: the Central allowance for the 2080s on rivers, the Upper End allowance for sea level rise to 2125. From rivers. Defences are not counted.
The Environment Agency flood map for planning. Councils use it to decide when a flood risk assessment and the sequential test are needed. It is indicative and does not show whether a particular property will flood.
Flood map ↗
Also on the record
Inside the Bures built-up area; Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) had this area as grade 3, but it predates the buildings here and the current map does not class it as farmland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Babergh Mid Suffolk - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Discharge of Condition(s)
Postcode
CO8 5AB
Received
14 Sept 2026
Validated
15 Sept 2026
Ward
Bures St Mary & Nayland
Parish
Bures St Mary
Case officer
Show
Target decision
10 Nov 2026
Applicant
Show

Public comments

No public comments yet.

Last counted 30 Sept 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-15223140
Planning Portal ref
PP-15223140
Consultation
15 Sept 2026
Comments by
6 Oct 2026
Statutory expiry
10 Nov 2026
Env. assessment
No
Babergh Mid Suffolk
Planning Authority Score
7.7/10
Good
#33 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Babergh Mid Suffolk is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #56 out of 296. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (95%) than the national average (90%).

Faster than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Babergh Mid Suffolk decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
89%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #124 of 296
95%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #68 of 296
77%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #56 of 296
34%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #83 of 296
74%
Minor dwellings approved
160 decided (1-9 homes)
73%
Major dwellings approved
11 decided (10+ homes)
93%
Change of use approved
40 decided
882
Total decisions
99 refused in the year to March 2026