Econ House, Old Maidstone Road, Sidcup, DA14 5BA Data via plota.co.uk

24/03610/S73A - Removal/variation of conditions Valid

Proposal

Minor Material Amendment under S73 of the Town and Country Planning Act to planning permission reference (granted for DEMOLITION OF EXISITNG OFFICE BUILDING AT ECON HOUSE AND 1,VICTORIA BUNGALOWS AND REMOVAL OF ALL PORTACABINS AND CONTAINERS .FORMATION OF NEW PEDESTRIAN ENTRANCE FROM OLD MAIDSTONE ROAD AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF A PART 1/PART2 STOREY OFFICE BUILDING, TOGETHER WITH ACCESS RAMPS, BIN AND CYCLE STORAGE ALONG WITH REPAIR AND RENEWAL AND PARTIAL REBUILDING OF THE EXISITNG BOUNDARY WALL ALONG OLD MAIDSTONE RD,THE INSTALLATION OF NEW CCTV SECURITY CAMERA AND THE FORMATION OF NEW LANDSCAPED AMENITY AREAS TOGETHER WITH ASSOCIATED HARD AND SOFT LANDSCAPING WORKS ) in order to vary condition 3 to allow for changes to the approved plans to include two storey office building (enlargement to previously approved design) with fire escape route and elevational alterations. . Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
28 Sept 2026
✓
Validated
1 Oct 2026
Decision
Expected by 26 Nov 2026

Under consideration

No decision has been issued yet. A decision is expected by 26 Nov 2026.

Comments are open until 26 Oct 2026

Comment on this application ↗

Associated applications 4

Site constraints 7

Green belt: London
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.
Read the government guidance ↗
Agricultural land, grade 2
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s), which most planning maps still show, had this area as grade 3. The predicted grade is Defra's current estimate; only a site survey settles it.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Archaeological priority area
An assessment or field evaluation may be asked for before ground works.
The council or Historic England considers archaeology likely here. A desk-based assessment, and sometimes trial trenching, can be asked for with the application.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 1
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
Radon affected area, class 2; Public transport access: PTAL 1a (very poor), TfL 2023, for the 100 m square; Air quality management area about 21 m away: Bexley AQMA.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI), Transport for London (public transport access levels, Powered by TfL Open Data, OGL v3.0, contains OS data © Crown copyright and database right 2025) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Bromley - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Bromley
Application type
Removal/variation of conditions
Postcode
DA14 5BA
Received
28 Sept 2026
Validated
1 Oct 2026
Ward
St Paul's Cray
Target decision
26 Nov 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show

Public comments

No public comments yet.

Last counted 6 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Comments by
26 Oct 2026
Bromley
Planning Authority Score
4.4/10
Below average
#178 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Bromley ranks #143 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Bromley is also one of the strictest councils - it refuses more householder applications than almost any other, with only 79% approved vs 90% nationally.

One of the strictest councils
only 79% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Bromley decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
77%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #276 of 296
79%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #280 of 296
66%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #143 of 296
33%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #72 of 296
63%
Minor dwellings approved
70 decided (1-9 homes)
88%
Major dwellings approved
8 decided (10+ homes)
50%
Change of use approved
42 decided
2,164
Total decisions
500 refused in the year to March 2026