Four-bed HMO at 36 Liverpool Lawn, Ramsgate
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Thanet Planning Committee on 18 Feb 2026.
The site
The property is a three-storey semi-detached dwelling accessed through an alleyway, with a front balcony and small defensible space.
“No. 36 Liverpool Lawn is a three-storey semi-detached dwelling, which is accessed via an alleyway off of the main road. It benefits from a balcony on the first floor of the front elevation, and a small piece of defensible space at ground floor level of the front elevation which separates a set of double doors from the street.”
Officer report
Earlier planning history
Earlier proposals for dwellings were refused and later allowed at appeal, followed by permission for seven three-storey dwellings in 2013.
“F/TH/13/0018 - Erection of 7no. 3-storey dwellings following demolition of existing building without compliance of condition 2 attached to planning permission F/TH/09/0915 to allow changes to the north, east, south and west elevations. Granted 21 Nov 2013.”
“F/TH/09/0915 - Erection of 7no. 3-storey dwellings, following demolition of existing building. Refused 18 Feb 2010. Allowed at appeal 15 Oct 2010.”
Officer report
Consultation responses
The town council objected, while highways, housing and conservation officers found the relevant arrangements acceptable subject to the issues they identified.
“Ramsgate Town Council: Objects. On the grounds of overdevelopment and its unsuitability for an HMO, including concerns regarding proximity to an existing HMO, inadequate bicycle storage, and potential fire safety issues. The proposal is also considered to conflict with the Local Plan policy, as it is located within 100 metres of an existing HMO.”
“KCC Highways: Initial comment: "Referring to the above description, it would appear that this development proposal does not meet the criteria to warrant involvement from the Highway Authority in accordance with the current consultation protocol arrangements. If there are any material highway safety concerns that you consider should be brought to the attention of the HA, then please contact us again with your specific concerns for our consideration…”
Officer report
Objections raised
Thirty-one objections concerned HMO concentration, conservation, fire safety, waste, parking, accommodation quality, neighbour amenity and consultation matters.
“Parking and highways - Severe existing parking pressure in area, proposal would make this worse - HMO could generate 5-10 additional vehicles - No off-street parking provision…”
“Quality of accommodation - Bedrooms too small (claims of 5.37 metres squared ad 8.76 metres squared) - Inadequate communal living space. - No private amenity space - Substandard compared with other HMOs approved with gardens - Ground floor bedroom privacy and security concerns…”
Officer report
Committee consideration
The principal planning officer outlined the application and the chair proposed approval of the officer recommendation, seconded by the vice chair.
“The Principal Planning Officer gave an outline of the report.”
“The Chair proposed and the Vice Chair seconded to APPROVE the officer recommendation, subject to the following conditions:”
Minutes
The vote
The motion to approve the officer recommendation was agreed when put to the vote.
“When put to the vote the motion was AGREED.”
Minutes
The decision
The application was approved subject to conditions controlling commencement, approved drawings, maximum occupancy and refuse storage.
“The refuse storage facilities as specified in the correspondence received from the agent on 4 February 2025, shall be provided prior to the first occupation of the HMO hereby approved and shall be kept available for that use at all times.”
Minutes
Councillors at the meeting
- Helen CrittendenChairLabourFor(no vote against recorded)
- Pat MakinsonLabourFor(no vote against recorded)
- Martin BoydLabourFor(no vote against recorded)
- Kristian BrightLabourFor(no vote against recorded)
- Mike GarnerGreenFor(no vote against recorded)
- David GreenLabourFor(no vote against recorded)
- Jennifer MatterfaceLabourFor(no vote against recorded)
- Paul MooreConservativeFor(no vote against recorded)
- Jack PackmanLabourFor(no vote against recorded)
- Marc RattiganConservativeFor(no vote against recorded)
- Rebecca WingGreenFor(no vote against recorded)
The minutes record this decision with no vote against, so each member present for this item is shown as voting for it.
Apologies Steve Albon Labour
Also attending Tricia Austin Green, Alan Currie Labour
Source: Plota analysis of the council's minutes; parties from the council's list of councillors.
Sources
- Thanet Planning Committee minutes, 18 February 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Thanet's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Committee
- Thanet Planning Committee
- Council
- Thanet
- Date
- Wednesday 18 February 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Councillors
- 11Labour 7Conservative 2Green 2Show votes
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- View application →
- All decisions
- Thanet committee decisions →
This committee's year
66 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 2 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.