Recreation Ground Deaks Lane Ansty West Sussex Data via plota.co.uk

Proposal

Propose to extend the external path and install a picket fence at the community building front. Install drainage on the eastern side of the building. Repair the maintenance track along the western boundary. Perform drainage works around the western northern, eastern, and southern boundaries. Install a picket fence around cricket nets. Regularise storage containers that are already present in the north field. Relocate the bin store. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
29 Aug 2025
✓
Validated
9 Feb 2026
✓
Committee
21 May 2026
✓
Approved
22 May 2026

Approved on 22 May 2026 · Planning Committee · Last checked 7 Jul 2026

Planning committee

Decided by Mid Sussex Planning Committee on 21 May 2026.

Approved unanimously

As officers recommended.

  • Officers advised approval because the works would enhance the recreation ground without significant harm to the countryside, residents, trees, ecology or drainage.
  • A third-party objection said the fencing could suggest ownership and restrict use of the recreation ground; consultees raised no objections subject to conditions.
  • Members unanimously approved planning permission, with 11 votes in favour, subject to the recommended conditions.
Read how the committee decided The proposed works, site and history, officers’ assessment, objections, consultation responses, vote and decision. Includes the meeting recording

Source: Plota analysis of Mid Sussex's committee minutes of 21 May 2026.

Site constraints 4

High Weald National Landscape
Great weight to conserving the landscape; major development restricted.
Previously an area of outstanding natural beauty, which is still the designation in law. Since 2023 authorities must seek to further its purpose, not merely have regard to it.
Agricultural land, grade 3b
Not best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Public bridleway about 20 m away
Matters where it crosses or adjoins the site: obstructing a path without a diversion order is an offence, and work cannot start until the order is confirmed.
Compiled from highway authority data, not the legal definitive map. A few authorities have not published, so no path shown is not proof there is none.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 2
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 11 September 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Mid Sussex - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Mid Sussex
Application type
Full Application
Postcode
RH17 5JB
Received
29 Aug 2025
Validated
9 Feb 2026
Ward
Cuckfield, Bolney And Ansty
Parish
Ansty And Staplefield
Case officer
Show
Target decision
6 Apr 2026
Decision
Permission
Decision date
22 May 2026
Decision level
Planning Committee
Applicant
Show

How this decision compares

Decided in 102 days from validation, 47 days slower than Mid Sussex's median of 55 for extensions. Approved, as 94% of extensions here are.

71%decided within 8 weeks
94%approved
535decided in the last year

Plota live figures for extensions decided by Mid Sussex in the last twelve months, from validation. Mid Sussex decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14202944
Committee
21 May 2026
Env. assessment
No
Mid Sussex
Planning Authority Score
4.8/10
Below average
#161 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Mid Sussex ranks #150 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (93%) than the national average (90%).

These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Mid Sussex decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
92%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #87 of 296
93%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #132 of 296
64%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #150 of 296
44%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #179 of 296
80%
Minor dwellings approved
83 decided (1-9 homes)
89%
Major dwellings approved
27 decided (10+ homes)
82%
Change of use approved
33 decided
1,115
Total decisions
93 refused in the year to March 2026